A university study of sign language interpreting in Slovakia and Czechia

We analyzed student satisfaction with sign language interpretation teaching in Slovak Republic (Trnava University, TU, n = 36) and the Czech Republic (Charles University, CU, n = 16), implemented as a bachelor’s university study program. The anonymous questionnaire with 46 questions was divided into 3 areas. In the area of “satisfaction” up to 90% of respondents from both universities rated this program as interesting. In the area of practical skills (“practice”), a significant difference was found especially in the questions focused on interpreting into sign language and understanding the deaf (P < 0.01), and students identified translation from sign language to spoken language as more challenging (43% or 75% of respondents). In the area of teaching conditions (“conditions”), the highest difference was found in the assessment of students’ satisfaction with the extent of practical teaching (47% of respondents answered positively at TU and 6.25% at CU), which may be related to different length of study (3 or 4 years at CU and TU, respectively). A surprising finding was the preference for teaching sign language without the use of voice and teaching led by a deaf lecturer (75−100% of respondents). This survey indicates the need to modify the teaching of sign language interpreting, particularly by increasing practical teaching in favor of interpreting from sign to spoken language.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05435-1
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A university study of sign language interpreting in Slovakia and Czechia

Adrian Jan Zasina, Roman Vojtechovský, Juraj Hladký, Klára Herčíková
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

A university study of sign language interpreting in Slovakia and Czechia

Adrian Jan Zasina, Roman Vojtechovský, Juraj Hladký, Klára Herčíková
article en

Abstract

We analyzed student satisfaction with sign language interpretation teaching in Slovak Republic (Trnava University, TU, n = 36) and the Czech Republic (Charles University, CU, n = 16), implemented as a bachelor’s university study program. The anonymous questionnaire with 46 questions was divided into 3 areas. In the area of “satisfaction” up to 90% of respondents from both universities rated this program as interesting. In the area of practical skills (“practice”), a significant difference was found especially in the questions focused on interpreting into sign language and understanding the deaf (P < 0.01), and students identified translation from sign language to spoken language as more challenging (43% or 75% of respondents). In the area of teaching conditions (“conditions”), the highest difference was found in the assessment of students’ satisfaction with the extent of practical teaching (47% of respondents answered positively at TU and 6.25% at CU), which may be related to different length of study (3 or 4 years at CU and TU, respectively). A surprising finding was the preference for teaching sign language without the use of voice and teaching led by a deaf lecturer (75−100% of respondents). This survey indicates the need to modify the teaching of sign language interpreting, particularly by increasing practical teaching in favor of interpreting from sign to spoken language.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
University of Trnava (SK), Charles University (CZ)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.