Young children do not distinguish between physical and epistemic uncertainty

When confronted with alternative possibilities, we experience different kinds of uncertainty: with physical uncertainty the outcome has yet to happen, while with epistemic uncertainty the outcome has happened, but is unknown. Previous work suggests an asymmetry in acquisition: children prepare for physically uncertainty prior to epistemic uncertainty (Robinson et al., 2006). The present studies tested the robustness of this developmental asymmetry with minimal contrast pairs of uncertainty conditions. Across two studies (N = 204, 3- to 6-year-old German-speaking children), we found no differences between the conditions: Children did not prepare differently for multiple incompatible outcomes of physically and epistemically uncertain events. Our findings stand in tension with previous findings and recent theoretical work on the development of modal cognition.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/q3y8x_v1
Primary Topic
Child and Animal Learning Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Young children do not distinguish between physical and epistemic uncertainty

Tanya Behne, Hannes Rakoczy, Marina Proft, Leonie Baumann et al.
1 links
Child and Animal Learning Development
article

Young children do not distinguish between physical and epistemic uncertainty

Tanya Behne, Hannes Rakoczy, Marina Proft, Leonie Baumann, Christina Schneider
article en

Abstract

When confronted with alternative possibilities, we experience different kinds of uncertainty: with physical uncertainty the outcome has yet to happen, while with epistemic uncertainty the outcome has happened, but is unknown. Previous work suggests an asymmetry in acquisition: children prepare for physically uncertainty prior to epistemic uncertainty (Robinson et al., 2006). The present studies tested the robustness of this developmental asymmetry with minimal contrast pairs of uncertainty conditions. Across two studies (N = 204, 3- to 6-year-old German-speaking children), we found no differences between the conditions: Children did not prepare differently for multiple incompatible outcomes of physically and epistemically uncertain events. Our findings stand in tension with previous findings and recent theoretical work on the development of modal cognition.

Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Child and Animal Learning Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Young children do not distinguish between physical and epistemic uncertainty — Tanya Behne, Hannes Rakoczy, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS