Olympic Competitiveness Assessment and Medal Prediction Based on TOPSIS Entropy Weight-Random Forest Model

With the continuous refinement of the Olympic system, existing medal prediction methods based on single indicators have become inadequate for assessing multidimensional competitiveness. Specifically, this study aims to establish a comprehensive evaluation system for evaluating medal-winning potential at the national level. Using the entropy method and PCA-TOPSIS approach, four core dimensions—ability, changes, competitiveness, and strategy—are extracted from twelve initial indicators to form a multidimensional evaluation index system. On this foundation, a Random Forest Regression model is employed to conduct a predictive analysis of Olympic medal distribution. The research findings indicate that the United States is expected to perform exceptionally well in both gold medals and total medals, maintaining its leading position. The model evaluation results, with a value of 0.9437 and an MSE of 0.0117, demonstrate a high degree of goodness-of-fit. Furthermore, in simulating predictions for the medal tally of the 2024 Olympic Games, the model's predictions deviate by less than 5% from actual data, further validating the model's effectiveness. The study reveals that this comprehensive evaluation system effectively overcomes the limitations of single indicators, providing a more scientific and comprehensive analytical approach to Olympic medal prediction. This research not only broadens the theoretical dimensions of sports competitiveness assessment but also offers a quantitative reference for countries to formulate Olympic strategies, thereby possessing significant theoretical and practical value.

Publication Details

Journal
Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25236/ajcis.2025.080614
Primary Topic
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Olympic Competitiveness Assessment and Medal Prediction Based on TOPSIS Entropy Weight-Random Forest Model

Academic Journal of Computing & Information Science
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
article

Olympic Competitiveness Assessment and Medal Prediction Based on TOPSIS Entropy Weight-Random Forest Model

article en

Abstract

With the continuous refinement of the Olympic system, existing medal prediction methods based on single indicators have become inadequate for assessing multidimensional competitiveness. Specifically, this study aims to establish a comprehensive evaluation system for evaluating medal-winning potential at the national level. Using the entropy method and PCA-TOPSIS approach, four core dimensions—ability, changes, competitiveness, and strategy—are extracted from twelve initial indicators to form a multidimensional evaluation index system. On this foundation, a Random Forest Regression model is employed to conduct a predictive analysis of Olympic medal distribution. The research findings indicate that the United States is expected to perform exceptionally well in both gold medals and total medals, maintaining its leading position. The model evaluation results, with a value of 0.9437 and an MSE of 0.0117, demonstrate a high degree of goodness-of-fit. Furthermore, in simulating predictions for the medal tally of the 2024 Olympic Games, the model's predictions deviate by less than 5% from actual data, further validating the model's effectiveness. The study reveals that this comprehensive evaluation system effectively overcomes the limitations of single indicators, providing a more scientific and comprehensive analytical approach to Olympic medal prediction. This research not only broadens the theoretical dimensions of sports competitiveness assessment but also offers a quantitative reference for countries to formulate Olympic strategies, thereby possessing significant theoretical and practical value.

Academic Journal of Computing & Information ScienceVol. 8(6)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Advanced Decision-Making Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.