Converting PSH estimates in terms of ground motion intensity into macroseismic intensity estimates

Abstract Methodological aspects relative to the conversion of probabilistic hazard evaluations in terms of ground motion intensity into hazard in terms of macroseismic Intensity. As a first step, the probabilistic relationships between ground motion intensity and macroseismic intensity are critically re-examined to account for the different formal properties of these two dimensions of the earthquake intensity. Then these relationships are coherently considered in the conversion of hazard curves by accounting for the inherent binning of macroseismic intensity values and of their inherent probabilistic nature. It is shown that approximate procedures currently used to provide this conversion may provide biased outcomes when the dispersion of values relative to ground motion intensity corresponding to macroseismic Intensity is dismissed or not properly accounted for. The impact of this possible bias is evaluated by considering the seismic hazard at reference site condition at the city of L’Aquila in Central Italy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Seismology
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-025-10313-z
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Converting PSH estimates in terms of ground motion intensity into macroseismic intensity estimates

Dario Albarello
2 links
Journal of Seismology
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Converting PSH estimates in terms of ground motion intensity into macroseismic intensity estimates

Dario Albarello
article en

Abstract

Abstract Methodological aspects relative to the conversion of probabilistic hazard evaluations in terms of ground motion intensity into hazard in terms of macroseismic Intensity. As a first step, the probabilistic relationships between ground motion intensity and macroseismic intensity are critically re-examined to account for the different formal properties of these two dimensions of the earthquake intensity. Then these relationships are coherently considered in the conversion of hazard curves by accounting for the inherent binning of macroseismic intensity values and of their inherent probabilistic nature. It is shown that approximate procedures currently used to provide this conversion may provide biased outcomes when the dispersion of values relative to ground motion intensity corresponding to macroseismic Intensity is dismissed or not properly accounted for. The impact of this possible bias is evaluated by considering the seismic hazard at reference site condition at the city of L’Aquila in Central Italy.

Journal of SeismologyVol. 29(4)
University of Siena (IT), Institute of Environmental Geology and Geoengineering (IT)
Università degli Studi di Siena
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.