Ensuring a Fair Development? The Role of Cohesion Policy and Just Transition Mechanism in the EU Green Initiative

The dual imperatives of environmental sustainability and equitable development occupy a central position in the EU’s strategic vision, yet their concurrent pursuit engenders inherent tensions. The EU has noted that some regions and people are more vulnerable in the process of realizing green ambitions and that the Just Transition Mechanism (JTM) and Cohesion Policy (CP) are two of the most crucial concepts and tools for the EU to mitigate this friction in order to mediate between socio-economic equity and the realization of green ambitions. This article examines how the EU’s CP and JTM reconcile environmental climate goals with social fairness, especially the potential challenges and interactions in this process. Combining legal analysis of EU treaties and funding regulations with policy evaluations of subsidy implementation, it identifies a divergence in primary objectives between the CP’s regional balanced development goals and the JTM’s mandate to mitigate the social impact of urgent decarbonization. The study argues that achieving a fair green transition requires a wider interpretation of “Just Transition” under EU climate law. It proposes harmonizing the CP and JTM, and sets the functionalism as the core to determine the integrative relationship between the CP and JTM. Furthermore, enforceable and convenient procedural rights for affected populations is a feasible way to improve the supporting effect of related structural funds. By addressing normative gaps in participatory equity, this analysis advances institutional pathways to align environmental urgency with just development in supranational policymaking and implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of European and Comparative Law
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.18601
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ensuring a Fair Development? The Role of Cohesion Policy and Just Transition Mechanism in the EU Green Initiative

H. Yin W.J. Gu J. Li
Review of European and Comparative Law
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Ensuring a Fair Development? The Role of Cohesion Policy and Just Transition Mechanism in the EU Green Initiative

H. Yin W.J. Gu J. Li
article en

Abstract

The dual imperatives of environmental sustainability and equitable development occupy a central position in the EU’s strategic vision, yet their concurrent pursuit engenders inherent tensions. The EU has noted that some regions and people are more vulnerable in the process of realizing green ambitions and that the Just Transition Mechanism (JTM) and Cohesion Policy (CP) are two of the most crucial concepts and tools for the EU to mitigate this friction in order to mediate between socio-economic equity and the realization of green ambitions. This article examines how the EU’s CP and JTM reconcile environmental climate goals with social fairness, especially the potential challenges and interactions in this process. Combining legal analysis of EU treaties and funding regulations with policy evaluations of subsidy implementation, it identifies a divergence in primary objectives between the CP’s regional balanced development goals and the JTM’s mandate to mitigate the social impact of urgent decarbonization. The study argues that achieving a fair green transition requires a wider interpretation of “Just Transition” under EU climate law. It proposes harmonizing the CP and JTM, and sets the functionalism as the core to determine the integrative relationship between the CP and JTM. Furthermore, enforceable and convenient procedural rights for affected populations is a feasible way to improve the supporting effect of related structural funds. By addressing normative gaps in participatory equity, this analysis advances institutional pathways to align environmental urgency with just development in supranational policymaking and implementation.

Review of European and Comparative Law
University of Macau (MO)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.