Three‐dimensional gravity current interactions with oblique slopes: Deflection, reflection and combined‐flow behaviours

ABSTRACT Gravity currents interacting with planar slopes have been thought to always ‘reflect’ a component of flow orthogonal to the slope irrespective of the flow incidence angle. Incoming flows are argued to undergo gravitational collapse, and generate internal waves, that propagate perpendicular to the bounding slope. These processes have been used to explain the widespread observation of palaeocurrents from sole marks at high angles to those in the associated ripple division. This paradigm for gravity current interactions with planar slopes has stood for more than three decades. Herein, these ideas are tested using three‐dimensional low‐density saline currents interacting with (but not overtopping) planar slopes of varying gradients, at a range of incidence angles. Fifteen new experiments show that the dominant flow process transitions from divergence‐, through reflection‐ to deflection‐dominated as the flow incidence angle decreases from 90° to 15° and the slope gradient increases from 20° to 40°. Multidirectional combined flows are documented above topographic slopes, varying as a function of location on a single slope, and the orientation and gradient of the slope. However, discrete internal waves are not observed, likely due to the spatial and temporal variability of flows on the slope. These findings challenge the paradigm of flow deflection and reflection in the existing model; there is not always a component of ‘reflected’ flow orthogonal to the planar slope. A new process model for flow‐planar‐slope interactions is presented. Flows broadly parallel to topographic slopes lead to up‐slope and down‐slope flow oscillations orthogonal to the bounding slope, providing new mechanics for the observation of high‐angle variation between sole marks and ripple derived palaeocurrents in elongate basin‐fills. Results also provide insights into the spatial distribution of distinctive combined‐flow bedforms, which are most applicable to settings where flows interact with high‐relief intrabasinal topography and/or basin margins.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sedimentology
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.70032
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Geological formations and processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three‐dimensional gravity current interactions with oblique slopes: Deflection, reflection and combined‐flow behaviours

Gareth M. Keevil, Ed Keavney, David M. Hodgson, Jeff Peakall et al.
3 citations
Sedimentology
Geological formations and processes
5.01
article

Three‐dimensional gravity current interactions with oblique slopes: Deflection, reflection and combined‐flow behaviours

Gareth M. Keevil, Ed Keavney, David M. Hodgson, Jeff Peakall, Ru Wang, Helena Brown
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Gravity currents interacting with planar slopes have been thought to always ‘reflect’ a component of flow orthogonal to the slope irrespective of the flow incidence angle. Incoming flows are argued to undergo gravitational collapse, and generate internal waves, that propagate perpendicular to the bounding slope. These processes have been used to explain the widespread observation of palaeocurrents from sole marks at high angles to those in the associated ripple division. This paradigm for gravity current interactions with planar slopes has stood for more than three decades. Herein, these ideas are tested using three‐dimensional low‐density saline currents interacting with (but not overtopping) planar slopes of varying gradients, at a range of incidence angles. Fifteen new experiments show that the dominant flow process transitions from divergence‐, through reflection‐ to deflection‐dominated as the flow incidence angle decreases from 90° to 15° and the slope gradient increases from 20° to 40°. Multidirectional combined flows are documented above topographic slopes, varying as a function of location on a single slope, and the orientation and gradient of the slope. However, discrete internal waves are not observed, likely due to the spatial and temporal variability of flows on the slope. These findings challenge the paradigm of flow deflection and reflection in the existing model; there is not always a component of ‘reflected’ flow orthogonal to the planar slope. A new process model for flow‐planar‐slope interactions is presented. Flows broadly parallel to topographic slopes lead to up‐slope and down‐slope flow oscillations orthogonal to the bounding slope, providing new mechanics for the observation of high‐angle variation between sole marks and ripple derived palaeocurrents in elongate basin‐fills. Results also provide insights into the spatial distribution of distinctive combined‐flow bedforms, which are most applicable to settings where flows interact with high‐relief intrabasinal topography and/or basin margins.

SedimentologyVol. 72(7)
University of Leeds (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Geological formations and processes
5.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.