Validating Griffith fracture propagation in the phase-field approach to fracture: The case of Mode III by means of the trousers test

Abstract At present, there is an abundance of results showing that the phase-field approach to fracture in elastic brittle materials — when properly accounting for material strength — describes the nucleation of fracture from large pre-existing cracks in a manner that is consistent with the Griffith competition between bulk deformation energy and surface fracture energy. By contrast, results that demonstrate the ability of this approach to describe Griffith fracture propagation are scarce and primarily restricted to Mode I in the setting of infinitesimally small deformations. Aimed at addressing this lacuna, the main objective of this paper is to show that the phase-field approach to fracture describes Mode III fracture propagation in a manner that is indeed consistent with the Griffith energy competition. This is accomplished via direct comparisons between phase-field predictions for fracture propagation in the so–called trousers test and the corresponding results that emerge from the Griffith energy competition. The latter are generated from full-field finite-element solutions that — as a second main contribution of this paper — also serve to bring to light the hitherto unexplored limitations of the classical Rivlin-Thomas-Greensmith formulas that are routinely used to analyze the trousers test.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Fracture
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-025-00869-9
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Numerical methods in engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating Griffith fracture propagation in the phase-field approach to fracture: The case of Mode III by means of the trousers test

Evan L. Breedlove, Oscar Lopez‐Pamies, Farhad Kamarei
6 citations
International Journal of Fracture
Numerical methods in engineering
5.18
article

Validating Griffith fracture propagation in the phase-field approach to fracture: The case of Mode III by means of the trousers test

Evan L. Breedlove, Oscar Lopez‐Pamies, Farhad Kamarei
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract At present, there is an abundance of results showing that the phase-field approach to fracture in elastic brittle materials — when properly accounting for material strength — describes the nucleation of fracture from large pre-existing cracks in a manner that is consistent with the Griffith competition between bulk deformation energy and surface fracture energy. By contrast, results that demonstrate the ability of this approach to describe Griffith fracture propagation are scarce and primarily restricted to Mode I in the setting of infinitesimally small deformations. Aimed at addressing this lacuna, the main objective of this paper is to show that the phase-field approach to fracture describes Mode III fracture propagation in a manner that is indeed consistent with the Griffith energy competition. This is accomplished via direct comparisons between phase-field predictions for fracture propagation in the so–called trousers test and the corresponding results that emerge from the Griffith energy competition. The latter are generated from full-field finite-element solutions that — as a second main contribution of this paper — also serve to bring to light the hitherto unexplored limitations of the classical Rivlin-Thomas-Greensmith formulas that are routinely used to analyze the trousers test.

International Journal of FractureVol. 249(3)
3M (United States) (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
National Science Foundation, 3M
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Numerical methods in engineering
5.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.