Moral Foundations and Obesity: The Role of Binding vs. Individualizing Foundations in Shaping Weight Stigma

Weight stigma significantly affects the quality of life for individuals with obesity in Western societies. While previous research has used moral foundations theory to predict attitudes toward stigmatized groups, such as the poor, immigrants, and sexual minorities, its application to weight-related stigma remains underexplored. This research explores the relationship between moral foundations, the moralization of obesity, and weight stigma in an underrepresented European context. In a pre-registered correlational study (Study 1), we found that binding and individualizing foundations differentially predicted the moralization of obesity and weight stigma. A follow-up pre-registered experiment (Study 2) suggested that highlighting the societal benefits of purity, a binding moral foundation, over care, an individualizing moral foundation, may increase the moralization of obesity and heighten weight stigma. These findings contribute to deepening understanding of the moral roots of weight stigma and underscore the importance of considering moral values in efforts to mitigate it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International review of social psychology
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.1068
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moral Foundations and Obesity: The Role of Binding vs. Individualizing Foundations in Shaping Weight Stigma

Alejandro Magallares, Cristian Catena‐Fernández
International review of social psychology
Obesity and Health Practices
article

Moral Foundations and Obesity: The Role of Binding vs. Individualizing Foundations in Shaping Weight Stigma

Alejandro Magallares, Cristian Catena‐Fernández
article en

Abstract

Weight stigma significantly affects the quality of life for individuals with obesity in Western societies. While previous research has used moral foundations theory to predict attitudes toward stigmatized groups, such as the poor, immigrants, and sexual minorities, its application to weight-related stigma remains underexplored. This research explores the relationship between moral foundations, the moralization of obesity, and weight stigma in an underrepresented European context. In a pre-registered correlational study (Study 1), we found that binding and individualizing foundations differentially predicted the moralization of obesity and weight stigma. A follow-up pre-registered experiment (Study 2) suggested that highlighting the societal benefits of purity, a binding moral foundation, over care, an individualizing moral foundation, may increase the moralization of obesity and heighten weight stigma. These findings contribute to deepening understanding of the moral roots of weight stigma and underscore the importance of considering moral values in efforts to mitigate it.

International review of social psychologyVol. 38(1)
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (ES)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Obesity and Health Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Moral Foundations and Obesity: The Role of Binding vs. Individualizing Foundations in Shaping Weight Stigma — Alejandro Magallares, Cristian Catena‐Fernández · International review of social psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS