Co-creation for health research

Co-creation refers to communities of interest working in partnership with researchers throughout the research process alongside a plan to identify and address power imbalances between communities and researchers. Co-creation may take on distinct forms, but has some common steps: building relationships, identifying assets, developing a co-creation structure, engaging communities and researchers to create an output, critically reflecting, and disseminating findings. An expanding evidence base demonstrates how co-creation can develop public health interventions, strengthen capacity, partially rebalance power, and meaningfully engage the public. Co-creation can accommodate diverse communities, thus providing specific strategies to make health research studies more inclusive. We used co-creation structures and principles to develop this paper on co-creation for health research. It provides an in-depth exploration of co-creation as a methodology and its relation to other participatory approaches, outlines key steps, explains practical applications for health research, considers limitations, and notes opportunities. By critically examining co-creation, we highlight the importance of good practices documenting co-creation in research. Many challenges in implementing co-creation can be anticipated and mitigated. Co-creation may be a powerful tool to reshape health research, facilitate reflection, partially rebalance power, and advance community-driven health research.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/tj2qm_v1
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-creation for health research

Eneyi Edith Kpokiri, Oluwakorede Joshua Adedeji, Gisa Dang, Abdulhammed Opeyemi Babatunde et al.
1 links
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Co-creation for health research

Eneyi Edith Kpokiri, Oluwakorede Joshua Adedeji, Gisa Dang, Abdulhammed Opeyemi Babatunde, Jonathan Stillo, Minn Thit Aung, Jana Deborah Mier-Alpaño, Nina T. Castillo-Carandang, Andrew Hamuza, Joseph D. Tucker, Yusuf Babatunde, Chunyan Li, Sultana N, F. Hugues, Martins O. Iyekekpolor, Stella Chinyonga
article en

Abstract

Co-creation refers to communities of interest working in partnership with researchers throughout the research process alongside a plan to identify and address power imbalances between communities and researchers. Co-creation may take on distinct forms, but has some common steps: building relationships, identifying assets, developing a co-creation structure, engaging communities and researchers to create an output, critically reflecting, and disseminating findings. An expanding evidence base demonstrates how co-creation can develop public health interventions, strengthen capacity, partially rebalance power, and meaningfully engage the public. Co-creation can accommodate diverse communities, thus providing specific strategies to make health research studies more inclusive. We used co-creation structures and principles to develop this paper on co-creation for health research. It provides an in-depth exploration of co-creation as a methodology and its relation to other participatory approaches, outlines key steps, explains practical applications for health research, considers limitations, and notes opportunities. By critically examining co-creation, we highlight the importance of good practices documenting co-creation in research. Many challenges in implementing co-creation can be anticipated and mitigated. Co-creation may be a powerful tool to reshape health research, facilitate reflection, partially rebalance power, and advance community-driven health research.

Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.