A token system for incentivising equal contributions in group work

Abstract Teamwork is an essential skill for STEM students, but ensuring equitable workload distribution remains a challenge. We propose a token-based method to incentivise equal work sharing. Each team of size N receives 2 N +1 tokens, which students openly discuss how to divide amongst their teammates. Two tokens result in a full grade, while three tokens earn a bonus. This system is implemented in small, frequent team assignments, promoting immediate peer feedback for underperforming teammates. The ability to bank bonus tokens ahead of time also allows flexibility for students who have illnesses or emergencies. The token system was piloted with university undergraduates in an introductory engineering and an upper-level physics course, with surveys conducted at the 16-week semester’s start and end. Results showed that students’ perceptions of group work improved, teams using the token system had more equitable contributions compared to a control group, and students had mostly positive comments about the token system. A few students pointed out some deficiencies, especially social pressure to not penalise underperforming students. Based on survey data and the authors’ experience, we offer the following recommendations for instructors: provide in-class time for token discussions even if the assignments are submitted outside of class, be prepared to mediate conflicts, monitor groups for the social pressure to avoid penalties, set a semester cap of 100% for token points to avoid work hoarding, and be careful when using the system with continually reshuffled teams. Overall though, the token system successfully promotes equitable contributions to team assignments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics Education
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/aded62
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A token system for incentivising equal contributions in group work

Sandra Carr, Siming Guo, David Kumi
Physics Education
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
article

A token system for incentivising equal contributions in group work

Sandra Carr, Siming Guo, David Kumi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Teamwork is an essential skill for STEM students, but ensuring equitable workload distribution remains a challenge. We propose a token-based method to incentivise equal work sharing. Each team of size N receives 2 N +1 tokens, which students openly discuss how to divide amongst their teammates. Two tokens result in a full grade, while three tokens earn a bonus. This system is implemented in small, frequent team assignments, promoting immediate peer feedback for underperforming teammates. The ability to bank bonus tokens ahead of time also allows flexibility for students who have illnesses or emergencies. The token system was piloted with university undergraduates in an introductory engineering and an upper-level physics course, with surveys conducted at the 16-week semester’s start and end. Results showed that students’ perceptions of group work improved, teams using the token system had more equitable contributions compared to a control group, and students had mostly positive comments about the token system. A few students pointed out some deficiencies, especially social pressure to not penalise underperforming students. Based on survey data and the authors’ experience, we offer the following recommendations for instructors: provide in-class time for token discussions even if the assignments are submitted outside of class, be prepared to mediate conflicts, monitor groups for the social pressure to avoid penalties, set a semester cap of 100% for token points to avoid work hoarding, and be careful when using the system with continually reshuffled teams. Overall though, the token system successfully promotes equitable contributions to team assignments.

Physics EducationVol. 60(5)
Coastal Carolina University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.