Who uses chatgpt? The role of moral identity in predicting the use of chatgpt

The popularity of Artificial Intelligence-based tools is rapidly growing. The broad availability of such technology offers immediate assistance in various tasks, from students’ graded assignments to employees’ written work. We aimed to examine whether the Big Five personality traits and the self-importance of moral identity predicted the use of ChatGPT for writing tasks at the time of ChatGPT’s growing popularity (i.e., January 2023). At the time, ChatGPT was a novelty that sparked controversy over its impact on education. Its release to public called into question the point of giving written assignments, both in schools and universities, and caused uncertainty about the authorship of written reports in other sectors. In this study, a sample of 420 American students (59% female) and 492 Americans from a community sample (56.5% female) completed the Ten-Item Personality Inventory, the Self-Importance of Moral Identity Scale, and answered questions about ChatGPT usage. Unfortunately, personality could not be included in the final analyses due to TIPI’s poor reliability. Both dimensions of self-importance of moral identity appeared to be significant. We found that internalization was negatively related to ChatGPT usage, while symbolization was positively (but only in the community sample) related to ChatGPT usage. We discuss these results in the context of further AI development and its impact on work and education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Psychology
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08126-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who uses chatgpt? The role of moral identity in predicting the use of chatgpt

Marta Kowal, S. Craig Roberts, Mariola Paruzel‐Czachura, Tomasz Frąckowiak et al.
1 citations
Current Psychology
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
4.20
article

Who uses chatgpt? The role of moral identity in predicting the use of chatgpt

Marta Kowal, S. Craig Roberts, Mariola Paruzel‐Czachura, Tomasz Frąckowiak, Piotr Sorokowski, Wiktoria Jędryczka
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The popularity of Artificial Intelligence-based tools is rapidly growing. The broad availability of such technology offers immediate assistance in various tasks, from students’ graded assignments to employees’ written work. We aimed to examine whether the Big Five personality traits and the self-importance of moral identity predicted the use of ChatGPT for writing tasks at the time of ChatGPT’s growing popularity (i.e., January 2023). At the time, ChatGPT was a novelty that sparked controversy over its impact on education. Its release to public called into question the point of giving written assignments, both in schools and universities, and caused uncertainty about the authorship of written reports in other sectors. In this study, a sample of 420 American students (59% female) and 492 Americans from a community sample (56.5% female) completed the Ten-Item Personality Inventory, the Self-Importance of Moral Identity Scale, and answered questions about ChatGPT usage. Unfortunately, personality could not be included in the final analyses due to TIPI’s poor reliability. Both dimensions of self-importance of moral identity appeared to be significant. We found that internalization was negatively related to ChatGPT usage, while symbolization was positively (but only in the community sample) related to ChatGPT usage. We discuss these results in the context of further AI development and its impact on work and education.

Current PsychologyVol. 44(23)
University of Stirling (GB), University of Wrocław (PL), Institute of Psychology (PL), University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Silesia in Katowice (PL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.