Reflections on Sustainability Reporting Regulation From a Northern European Perspective

The essay reflects on the recent legislative changes on corporate sustainability. I focus on the European Union Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD, EU 2022/2464) and associated sustainability reporting regulation, and how they have been enacted in Northern Europe, Finland in particular. I point out to some of the observations such as costs of delay, lack of sustainability expertise, need for reallocation of resources in and out of companies, contents of disclosure and the political struggle over sustainability reporting. Finally, I claim that the perceived ambiguity of sustainability disclosures should not be used as an excuse to avoid or delay their development. Continuous institutional support is needed to make sustainability accounting a robust and trusted part of organisational and societal decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social and Environmental Accountability Journal
Published
2025-05-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160x.2025.2533121
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reflections on Sustainability Reporting Regulation From a Northern European Perspective

Hannele Mäkelä
2 citations
Social and Environmental Accountability Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
4.45
article

Reflections on Sustainability Reporting Regulation From a Northern European Perspective

Hannele Mäkelä
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The essay reflects on the recent legislative changes on corporate sustainability. I focus on the European Union Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD, EU 2022/2464) and associated sustainability reporting regulation, and how they have been enacted in Northern Europe, Finland in particular. I point out to some of the observations such as costs of delay, lack of sustainability expertise, need for reallocation of resources in and out of companies, contents of disclosure and the political struggle over sustainability reporting. Finally, I claim that the perceived ambiguity of sustainability disclosures should not be used as an excuse to avoid or delay their development. Continuous institutional support is needed to make sustainability accounting a robust and trusted part of organisational and societal decision-making.

Social and Environmental Accountability JournalVol. 45(2)
Tampere University (FI)
Academy of Finland, Kulttuurin ja Yhteiskunnan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reflections on Sustainability Reporting Regulation From a Northern European Perspective — Hannele Mäkelä · Social and Environmental Accountability Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS