Redesigning College English Goals: A Global Citizenship Approach

This study evaluates the curriculum goals of a compulsory College English I course at a Chinese university through the lens of global citizenship education (GCE), identifying limitations and proposing pedagogical reforms. Adopting UNESCO's three-dimensional GCE framework (cognitive, socio-emotional, behavioral), the analysis critiques existing course objectives using scholarly literature on language curriculum design and intercultural education. While current goals promote language proficiency and critical analysis of English media, they exhibit three critical gaps: (1) Insufficient engagement with global power dynamics and inequalities; (2) Essentialist treatment of culture (limited to China vs. "Western" binaries); (3) Instrumentalist language views neglecting identity-shaping power. Proposed solutions emphasize teacher agency in adapting goals via global-issue integration, culturally responsive tasks (e.g., TBLT), and critical curriculum contextualization. Successful GCE integration requires empowering teachers to mediate rigid objectives, foster intercultural complexity, and navigate macro-level constraints (e.g., exam-oriented systems). The study advocates for goal flexibility and non-Western GCE perspectives in EFL contexts.

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Educational Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25236/fer.2025.080613
Primary Topic
Global Education and Multiculturalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Redesigning College English Goals: A Global Citizenship Approach

Frontiers in Educational Research
Global Education and Multiculturalism
article

Redesigning College English Goals: A Global Citizenship Approach

article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the curriculum goals of a compulsory College English I course at a Chinese university through the lens of global citizenship education (GCE), identifying limitations and proposing pedagogical reforms. Adopting UNESCO's three-dimensional GCE framework (cognitive, socio-emotional, behavioral), the analysis critiques existing course objectives using scholarly literature on language curriculum design and intercultural education. While current goals promote language proficiency and critical analysis of English media, they exhibit three critical gaps: (1) Insufficient engagement with global power dynamics and inequalities; (2) Essentialist treatment of culture (limited to China vs. "Western" binaries); (3) Instrumentalist language views neglecting identity-shaping power. Proposed solutions emphasize teacher agency in adapting goals via global-issue integration, culturally responsive tasks (e.g., TBLT), and critical curriculum contextualization. Successful GCE integration requires empowering teachers to mediate rigid objectives, foster intercultural complexity, and navigate macro-level constraints (e.g., exam-oriented systems). The study advocates for goal flexibility and non-Western GCE perspectives in EFL contexts.

Frontiers in Educational ResearchVol. 8(6)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Global Education and Multiculturalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.