Applying EQTransformer to laboratory earthquakes: detecting and picking acoustic emissions with machine learning

Abstract Acoustic emissions (AEs) are bursts of elastic waves generated by ruptures in laboratory rock mechanics experiments that mirror typical seismograms recorded in natural earthquakes, albeit at much higher frequencies. Traditionally, AE events were manually sorted and picked—a time-consuming and daunting task. Recently, automatic methods based on machine learning (ML) or template matching have been applied to detect AE events. In order to accurately and quickly analyze a large quantity of raw AE waveforms, the current study explores the direct application of ML tools designed for regular earthquake waveforms to the AE detection and picking process. We investigated applications of a deep-learning-based detector EQTransformer (EQT) that was trained on global earthquake data to laboratory AE datasets without retraining. Two AE datasets were collected from laboratory deformation experiments during the syn-deformational phase transformation from olivine to spinel in Mg 2 GeO 4 . We compared EQT’s performance on AEs to its published performance on natural earthquakes, as well as to a neural network (NN) designed for AE detection and picking called MultiNet. When applied to dataset D2540, EQT detected all 3901 previously identified events in the dataset with a mean P -pick error of < 1 sampling point, in addition to 2521 previously undetected events. For dataset D1247, EQT also detected all 550 known events with a mean error of < 1 sampling point, as well as 22 new events. In both cases, EQT performed within the standards advertised for EQT on earthquake data and with similar precision to MultiNet. Our results indicate that the EQT model pre-trained using global seismic data can be directly applied to accurately pick AE events in laboratory settings, with robust performance across multiple recording channels. Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Planets and Space
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-025-02237-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying EQTransformer to laboratory earthquakes: detecting and picking acoustic emissions with machine learning

Jack Sheehan, Timothy Officer, Lupei Zhu, Lindsay Chuang et al.
1 citations
Earth Planets and Space
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
2.48
article

Applying EQTransformer to laboratory earthquakes: detecting and picking acoustic emissions with machine learning

Jack Sheehan, Timothy Officer, Lupei Zhu, Lindsay Chuang, Zhigang Peng, Qiushi Zhai, Yanbin Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Acoustic emissions (AEs) are bursts of elastic waves generated by ruptures in laboratory rock mechanics experiments that mirror typical seismograms recorded in natural earthquakes, albeit at much higher frequencies. Traditionally, AE events were manually sorted and picked—a time-consuming and daunting task. Recently, automatic methods based on machine learning (ML) or template matching have been applied to detect AE events. In order to accurately and quickly analyze a large quantity of raw AE waveforms, the current study explores the direct application of ML tools designed for regular earthquake waveforms to the AE detection and picking process. We investigated applications of a deep-learning-based detector EQTransformer (EQT) that was trained on global earthquake data to laboratory AE datasets without retraining. Two AE datasets were collected from laboratory deformation experiments during the syn-deformational phase transformation from olivine to spinel in Mg 2 GeO 4 . We compared EQT’s performance on AEs to its published performance on natural earthquakes, as well as to a neural network (NN) designed for AE detection and picking called MultiNet. When applied to dataset D2540, EQT detected all 3901 previously identified events in the dataset with a mean P -pick error of < 1 sampling point, in addition to 2521 previously undetected events. For dataset D1247, EQT also detected all 550 known events with a mean error of < 1 sampling point, as well as 22 new events. In both cases, EQT performed within the standards advertised for EQT on earthquake data and with similar precision to MultiNet. Our results indicate that the EQT model pre-trained using global seismic data can be directly applied to accurately pick AE events in laboratory settings, with robust performance across multiple recording channels. Graphical Abstract

Earth Planets and SpaceVol. 77(1)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), University of Chicago (US), Geospatial Research (United Kingdom) (GB), Rice University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, University of Chicago, Office of Science, Argonne National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.