The role of cost benchmarking in public utility regulation

Abstract Cost benchmarking, as it is used in public utility regulation, refers to the use of various statistical and non-statistical techniques to estimate the efficient cost function of a regulated firm based on the out-turn performance data of other comparator firms. Whereas benchmarking is often seen as a key part of the toolkit of public utility regulators, there are several fundamental theoretical and practical problems with benchmarking which limit its usefulness as a guide for setting a revenue allowance for a regulated firm. This paper highlights those problems so that practitioners can adopt realistic expectations of what benchmarking can achieve. Whereas benchmarking should continue to be developed to improve its usefulness, these observations set out here suggest caution before relying on cost benchmarking as a primary driver of the revenue allowance of a regulated firm. We propose a ‘code of practice’ that might be adopted by regulators seeking to use benchmarking techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Regulatory Economics
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-025-09493-w
Primary Topic
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of cost benchmarking in public utility regulation

Darryl R. Biggar
Journal of Regulatory Economics
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
article

The role of cost benchmarking in public utility regulation

Darryl R. Biggar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cost benchmarking, as it is used in public utility regulation, refers to the use of various statistical and non-statistical techniques to estimate the efficient cost function of a regulated firm based on the out-turn performance data of other comparator firms. Whereas benchmarking is often seen as a key part of the toolkit of public utility regulators, there are several fundamental theoretical and practical problems with benchmarking which limit its usefulness as a guide for setting a revenue allowance for a regulated firm. This paper highlights those problems so that practitioners can adopt realistic expectations of what benchmarking can achieve. Whereas benchmarking should continue to be developed to improve its usefulness, these observations set out here suggest caution before relying on cost benchmarking as a primary driver of the revenue allowance of a regulated firm. We propose a ‘code of practice’ that might be adopted by regulators seeking to use benchmarking techniques.

Journal of Regulatory EconomicsVol. 68(3)
IP Australia (AU)
Monash University
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.