Do All Food and Beverage Firms Benefit From Voluntary ESG Reporting? Evidence From China's Listed Companies

ABSTRACT This study investigates the relationship between voluntary Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting and firm performance—measured by Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), and Tobin's Q—in China's food and beverage (F&B) sector. Using a fixed effects panel model on a data set of both reporting and non‐reporting listed firms from 2008 to 2023, we find that, overall, the issuance of standalone ESG reports is negatively associated with firm performance across all three measures. However, the results also reveal that this relationship becomes positive when firms exhibit ESG performance above the industry median. These findings suggest that ESG reporting, in isolation, may represent a costly signal in the short term. Nonetheless, firms that effectively implement ESG initiatives and earn superior scores from third‐party agencies can achieve improved outcomes over time. Implications for the F&B sector are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agribusiness
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.70004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do All Food and Beverage Firms Benefit From Voluntary ESG Reporting? Evidence From China's Listed Companies

Hongchang Yan, Ashok K. Mishra, Xi Zhou
1 citations
Agribusiness
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
article

Do All Food and Beverage Firms Benefit From Voluntary ESG Reporting? Evidence From China's Listed Companies

Hongchang Yan, Ashok K. Mishra, Xi Zhou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates the relationship between voluntary Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) reporting and firm performance—measured by Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), and Tobin's Q—in China's food and beverage (F&B) sector. Using a fixed effects panel model on a data set of both reporting and non‐reporting listed firms from 2008 to 2023, we find that, overall, the issuance of standalone ESG reports is negatively associated with firm performance across all three measures. However, the results also reveal that this relationship becomes positive when firms exhibit ESG performance above the industry median. These findings suggest that ESG reporting, in isolation, may represent a costly signal in the short term. Nonetheless, firms that effectively implement ESG initiatives and earn superior scores from third‐party agencies can achieve improved outcomes over time. Implications for the F&B sector are discussed.

Agribusiness
State Power Investment Corporation (China) (CN), State Development & Investment Corporation (China) (CN), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do All Food and Beverage Firms Benefit From Voluntary ESG Reporting? Evidence From China's Listed Companies — Hongchang Yan, Ashok K. Mishra, et al. · Agribusiness (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS