Enhancing propensity score analysis with data missing not at random: Introducing dual-forest proximity imputation

Researchers using propensity score analysis (PSA) to estimate treatment effects using secondary data may have to handle data that are missing not at random (MNAR). Existing methods for PSA with MNAR data use logistic regression to model the missing data mechanisms, thus requiring manual specification of functional forms, and are difficult to implement with a large number of covariates. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes alternatives to existing methods by replacing logistic regression with a random forest. Also, it introduces the dual-forest proximity imputation method, which leverages two types of proximity matrices of random forest techniques and incorporates missingness pattern information in each matrix. Results from a Monte Carlo simulation show dual-forest proximity imputation's enhanced bias reduction with various types of MNAR mechanisms as compared to existing and alternative methods. A case study is also provided using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (Enders, 1979) (NLSY79).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavior Research Methods
Published
2026-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-026-03024-x
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing propensity score analysis with data missing not at random: Introducing dual-forest proximity imputation

Yongseok Lee, Walter L. Leite
Behavior Research Methods
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

Enhancing propensity score analysis with data missing not at random: Introducing dual-forest proximity imputation

Yongseok Lee, Walter L. Leite
article en

Abstract

Researchers using propensity score analysis (PSA) to estimate treatment effects using secondary data may have to handle data that are missing not at random (MNAR). Existing methods for PSA with MNAR data use logistic regression to model the missing data mechanisms, thus requiring manual specification of functional forms, and are difficult to implement with a large number of covariates. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes alternatives to existing methods by replacing logistic regression with a random forest. Also, it introduces the dual-forest proximity imputation method, which leverages two types of proximity matrices of random forest techniques and incorporates missingness pattern information in each matrix. Results from a Monte Carlo simulation show dual-forest proximity imputation's enhanced bias reduction with various types of MNAR mechanisms as compared to existing and alternative methods. A case study is also provided using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (Enders, 1979) (NLSY79).

Behavior Research MethodsVol. 58(7)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US), University of Florida (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhancing propensity score analysis with data missing not at random: Introducing dual-forest proximity imputation — Yongseok Lee, Walter L. Leite · Behavior Research Methods (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS