Quantitative Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Ceramic Crown Restorations Obtained by Model Scanner, Intraoral Scanner, and Different CBCT Scans

(1) Background: This study aimed to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of ceramic crowns produced by various digital methods using microcomputed tomography (MCT) imaging. (2) Methods: The ceramic crown preparation was performed on typodont maxillary first premolar. The crown preparation was scanned with an intraoral scanner and a model scanner, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed with three different voxel sizes (0.075 mm, 0.1 mm, and 0.15 mm). The space between the crown and prepared teeth was measured at nine different points in both coronal and sagittal sections. Three different digital model acquisition techniques, namely, intraoral scanning, model scanning, and CBCT-based standard tessellation language (STL) reconstruction, were compared in terms of marginal and internal fit. (3) Results: Quantitative analyses revealed that model scanners exhibited the lowest marginal and internal gap values, indicating superior fit compared to intraoral scanners and CBCT-based models. The highest gap values were observed in the CBCT group with a voxel size of 0.15 mm. Overall, crowns obtained from model scanners demonstrated the highest success rates in both marginal and internal fit. (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, this study highlights the critical role of digital scanning accuracy in achieving clinically acceptable prosthetic fits and emphasizes the need for continued technological advancement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15148017
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Ceramic Crown Restorations Obtained by Model Scanner, Intraoral Scanner, and Different CBCT Scans

Kaan Orhan, Bora Akat, Fehmi Gönüldaş, Ayben Şentürk et al.
1 citations
Applied Sciences
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
article

Quantitative Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Ceramic Crown Restorations Obtained by Model Scanner, Intraoral Scanner, and Different CBCT Scans

Kaan Orhan, Bora Akat, Fehmi Gönüldaş, Ayben Şentürk, Mert Ocak, Merve Önder, Mehmet Ali Kılıçarslan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

(1) Background: This study aimed to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of ceramic crowns produced by various digital methods using microcomputed tomography (MCT) imaging. (2) Methods: The ceramic crown preparation was performed on typodont maxillary first premolar. The crown preparation was scanned with an intraoral scanner and a model scanner, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were performed with three different voxel sizes (0.075 mm, 0.1 mm, and 0.15 mm). The space between the crown and prepared teeth was measured at nine different points in both coronal and sagittal sections. Three different digital model acquisition techniques, namely, intraoral scanning, model scanning, and CBCT-based standard tessellation language (STL) reconstruction, were compared in terms of marginal and internal fit. (3) Results: Quantitative analyses revealed that model scanners exhibited the lowest marginal and internal gap values, indicating superior fit compared to intraoral scanners and CBCT-based models. The highest gap values were observed in the CBCT group with a voxel size of 0.15 mm. Overall, crowns obtained from model scanners demonstrated the highest success rates in both marginal and internal fit. (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, this study highlights the critical role of digital scanning accuracy in achieving clinically acceptable prosthetic fits and emphasizes the need for continued technological advancement.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(14)
Semmelweis University (HU), Ankara University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.