JWST/MIRI Reveals the True Number Density of Massive Galaxies in the Early Universe

Abstract Early JWST studies reporting an unexpected abundance of massive galaxies at z ∼ 5–8 challenge galaxy formation models in the ΛCDM framework. Previous stellar mass ( M ⋆ ) estimates suffered from large uncertainties due to the lack of rest-frame near-infrared data. Using deep JWST/NIRCam and Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI) photometry from Public Release IMaging for Extragalactic Research, we systematically analyze massive galaxies at z ∼ 3–8, leveraging rest-frame ≳1 μ m constraints. We find MIRI is critical for robust M ⋆ measurements for massive galaxies at z > 5: excluding MIRI overestimates M ⋆ by ∼0.4 dex on average for M ⋆ > 10 10 M ⊙ galaxies, with no significant effects at lower masses. This reduces number densities of M ⋆ > 10 10 M ⊙ (10 10.3 M ⊙ ) galaxies by ∼36% (55%). MIRI inclusion also reduces “Little Red Dot” (LRD) contamination in massive galaxy samples, lowering the LRD fraction from ∼32% to ∼13% at M ⋆ > 10 10.3 M ⊙ . Assuming pure stellar origins, LRDs exhibit M ⋆ ∼ 10 9–10.5 M ⊙ with MIRI constraints, rarely exceeding 10 10.5 M ⊙ . Within standard ΛCDM, our results indicate a moderate increase in the baryon-to-star conversion efficiency ( ϵ ) toward higher redshifts and masses at z > 3. For the most massive z ∼ 8 galaxies, ϵ ∼ 0.3, compared to ϵ ≲ 0.2 for typical galaxies at z < 3. This result is consistent with models where high gas densities and short free-fall times suppress stellar feedback in massive high- z halos.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/adebe7
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

JWST/MIRI Reveals the True Number Density of Massive Galaxies in the Early Universe

Yangyao Chen, Xianzhong Zheng, Y. Sophia Dai, Avishai Dekel et al.
12 citations
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
13.86
article

JWST/MIRI Reveals the True Number Density of Massive Galaxies in the Early Universe

Yangyao Chen, Xianzhong Zheng, Y. Sophia Dai, Avishai Dekel, D. Elbaz, Tao Wang, H. J. Mo, J. S. Huang, Hanwen Sun, Cheng Cheng, Zheng Cai, Zhaozhou Li, Luwenjia Zhou, Longyue Chen, Yijun Wang, Ke Xu, Tiancheng Yang
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Abstract Early JWST studies reporting an unexpected abundance of massive galaxies at z ∼ 5–8 challenge galaxy formation models in the ΛCDM framework. Previous stellar mass ( M ⋆ ) estimates suffered from large uncertainties due to the lack of rest-frame near-infrared data. Using deep JWST/NIRCam and Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI) photometry from Public Release IMaging for Extragalactic Research, we systematically analyze massive galaxies at z ∼ 3–8, leveraging rest-frame ≳1 μ m constraints. We find MIRI is critical for robust M ⋆ measurements for massive galaxies at z > 5: excluding MIRI overestimates M ⋆ by ∼0.4 dex on average for M ⋆ > 10 10 M ⊙ galaxies, with no significant effects at lower masses. This reduces number densities of M ⋆ > 10 10 M ⊙ (10 10.3 M ⊙ ) galaxies by ∼36% (55%). MIRI inclusion also reduces “Little Red Dot” (LRD) contamination in massive galaxy samples, lowering the LRD fraction from ∼32% to ∼13% at M ⋆ > 10 10.3 M ⊙ . Assuming pure stellar origins, LRDs exhibit M ⋆ ∼ 10 9–10.5 M ⊙ with MIRI constraints, rarely exceeding 10 10.5 M ⊙ . Within standard ΛCDM, our results indicate a moderate increase in the baryon-to-star conversion efficiency ( ϵ ) toward higher redshifts and masses at z > 3. For the most massive z ∼ 8 galaxies, ϵ ∼ 0.3, compared to ϵ ≲ 0.2 for typical galaxies at z < 3. This result is consistent with models where high gas densities and short free-fall times suppress stellar feedback in massive high- z halos.

The Astrophysical Journal LettersVol. 988(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
13.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.