Citizens’ expectations about public services: a systematic literature review

Citizens hold varying expectations and demands regarding the quality, performance, and efficiency of public services. How governments respond to citizens’ expectations about public services (CEPS) to increase trust and satisfaction with government has been a consistently important research topic. However, the existing literature lacks a holistic understanding of CEPS. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this article presents a systematic review of 119 studies conducted between 1978 and 2023, exploring conceptual ambiguities, conflicting typologies, and inconsistent findings on CEPS in public service settings. Importantly, this study identifies a discourse explaining the antecedents and consequences of CEPS, which encompasses five broad categories: individual, political, organizational, economic, and technological factors related to CEPS. Expectations are diverse and dynamic, and understanding their role in governance requires linking them to broader factors, particularly the adoption of modern technology. These findings have important implications for research and practice in government trust and public service satisfaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05357-y
Citations
3
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Citizens’ expectations about public services: a systematic literature review

Bingsheng Liu, Yuequn Cao, Zengqiang Qin, Jinfeng Zhang et al.
3 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
E-Government and Public Services
25.57
article

Citizens’ expectations about public services: a systematic literature review

Bingsheng Liu, Yuequn Cao, Zengqiang Qin, Jinfeng Zhang, Chong Xu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Citizens hold varying expectations and demands regarding the quality, performance, and efficiency of public services. How governments respond to citizens’ expectations about public services (CEPS) to increase trust and satisfaction with government has been a consistently important research topic. However, the existing literature lacks a holistic understanding of CEPS. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this article presents a systematic review of 119 studies conducted between 1978 and 2023, exploring conceptual ambiguities, conflicting typologies, and inconsistent findings on CEPS in public service settings. Importantly, this study identifies a discourse explaining the antecedents and consequences of CEPS, which encompasses five broad categories: individual, political, organizational, economic, and technological factors related to CEPS. Expectations are diverse and dynamic, and understanding their role in governance requires linking them to broader factors, particularly the adoption of modern technology. These findings have important implications for research and practice in government trust and public service satisfaction.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Minzu University of China (CN), Chongqing University (CN), Hebei University of Technology (CN), Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
E-Government and Public Services
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Citizens’ expectations about public services: a systematic literature review — Bingsheng Liu, Yuequn Cao, et al. · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS