PUTUSAN PENJATUHAN PIDANA SEUMUR HIDUP DALAM KASUS PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA DENGAN TERDAKWA FERDY SAMBO DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF TEORI KEADILAN

The premeditated murder case involving the defendant Ferdy Sambo has attracted attention due to its involvement of law enforcement officers and resulting in a life imprisonment sentence. This research aims to analyze the ruling from the perspective of justice theory, particularly according to Aristotelian views. The method used is a juridical-normative approach to the judge's ruling and legal considerations. The findings indicate that the decision reflects retributive justice leaning towards a more rehabilitative and humane approach. However, in distributive and corrective justice, debates arise regarding the proportionality of the punishment, the defendant's position as a former high-ranking police officer, and public expectations of justice. This ruling is legally valid, yet it leaves unresolved moral and ethical questions in its implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Collegium Studiosum Journal
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v8i1.1668
Primary Topic
Legal and Social Justice Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PUTUSAN PENJATUHAN PIDANA SEUMUR HIDUP DALAM KASUS PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA DENGAN TERDAKWA FERDY SAMBO DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF TEORI KEADILAN

Rahtami Susanti, Aulia Adelia Wulandari
Collegium Studiosum Journal
Legal and Social Justice Studies
article

PUTUSAN PENJATUHAN PIDANA SEUMUR HIDUP DALAM KASUS PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA DENGAN TERDAKWA FERDY SAMBO DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF TEORI KEADILAN

Rahtami Susanti, Aulia Adelia Wulandari
article en

Abstract

The premeditated murder case involving the defendant Ferdy Sambo has attracted attention due to its involvement of law enforcement officers and resulting in a life imprisonment sentence. This research aims to analyze the ruling from the perspective of justice theory, particularly according to Aristotelian views. The method used is a juridical-normative approach to the judge's ruling and legal considerations. The findings indicate that the decision reflects retributive justice leaning towards a more rehabilitative and humane approach. However, in distributive and corrective justice, debates arise regarding the proportionality of the punishment, the defendant's position as a former high-ranking police officer, and public expectations of justice. This ruling is legally valid, yet it leaves unresolved moral and ethical questions in its implementation.

Collegium Studiosum JournalVol. 8(1)
Muhammadiyah University Purwokerto (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Legal and Social Justice Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.