Epigenetic biomarkers predict macrovascular events in individuals with type 2 diabetes

Prediction of incident macrovascular events (iMEs) in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains suboptimal. We aim to discover blood-based epigenetic biomarkers predicting iMEs in 752 newly diagnosed individuals with T2D, among whom 102 developed iMEs during follow-up. 461 DNA methylation sites, e.g., near ARID3A, GATA5, HDAC4, IRS2, and TMEM51, associate with iMEs. Using cross-validation, a methylation risk score (MRS) containing 87 sites predicts iMEs with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 and an AUC of 0.84 for the combination of MRS and clinical risk factors, better than SCORE2-Diabetes (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2-Diabetes), UKPDS (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study), Framingham, and polygenic risk scores (AUCs = 0.54-0.62). This epigenetic biomarker has a negative predictive value of 95.9% and improves the classification of iMEs with continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) showing 90.2% improvement versus clinical factors. Atherosclerotic versus non-atherosclerotic aortas show 78 differentially methylated sites. We validate 32 sites in EPIC-Potsdam and 43 in OPTIMED cohorts, including an MRS (AUC = 0.80). Together, blood-based epigenetic biomarkers predict iMEs better than clinical risk factors, supporting its future clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Reports Medicine
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102290
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epigenetic biomarkers predict macrovascular events in individuals with type 2 diabetes

Alexander Perfilyev, Andreas Edsfeldt, Alice Maguolo, Marlena Maziarz et al.
3 citations
Cell Reports Medicine
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
2.42
article

Epigenetic biomarkers predict macrovascular events in individuals with type 2 diabetes

Alexander Perfilyev, Andreas Edsfeldt, Alice Maguolo, Marlena Maziarz, Emma Ahlqvist, Monta Brīvība, Matthias Bernd Schulze, Charlotte Ling, Jiangming Sun, Isabel Gonçalves, Sonia García-Calzón, Fabian Eichelmann, Axel Lindström, Jānis Kloviņš
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Prediction of incident macrovascular events (iMEs) in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains suboptimal. We aim to discover blood-based epigenetic biomarkers predicting iMEs in 752 newly diagnosed individuals with T2D, among whom 102 developed iMEs during follow-up. 461 DNA methylation sites, e.g., near ARID3A, GATA5, HDAC4, IRS2, and TMEM51, associate with iMEs. Using cross-validation, a methylation risk score (MRS) containing 87 sites predicts iMEs with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 and an AUC of 0.84 for the combination of MRS and clinical risk factors, better than SCORE2-Diabetes (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2-Diabetes), UKPDS (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study), Framingham, and polygenic risk scores (AUCs = 0.54-0.62). This epigenetic biomarker has a negative predictive value of 95.9% and improves the classification of iMEs with continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) showing 90.2% improvement versus clinical factors. Atherosclerotic versus non-atherosclerotic aortas show 78 differentially methylated sites. We validate 32 sites in EPIC-Potsdam and 43 in OPTIMED cohorts, including an MRS (AUC = 0.80). Together, blood-based epigenetic biomarkers predict iMEs better than clinical risk factors, supporting its future clinical use.

Cell Reports MedicineVol. 6(8)
Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre (LV), Malmö University (SE), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. (DE), German Institute of Human Nutrition (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.