Landscape governance as a matter of concern: A relational framework

In this article, we propose a relational social-ecological framework as alternative to functional views of nature, quantitative interpretations of value and bipolar conceptions of human-nature relationships. Instead, we conceptualise the complementary and reciprocal relations between nature, human behaviour and governance in a 'landscape governance' triangle in which: the relationship between nature and behaviour is conceptualised as signification and identity; the relationship between nature and governance as ordering and generation; and the relationship between governance and behaviour as authority and agency. From this relational conception, it implies that landscape governance is more a matter of concern than only a matter of fact, according to Bruno Latour's proposal. We see this as the basis for an ethics of care that gives meaning to a relational social-ecological approach without losing the urgency of countering biodiversity loss and climate change. We illustrate our landscape governance triangle with examples from The Netherlands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AMBIO
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02226-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Landscape governance as a matter of concern: A relational framework

Judith Westerink, Wim de Haas
1 citations
AMBIO
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
1.11
article

Landscape governance as a matter of concern: A relational framework

Judith Westerink, Wim de Haas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this article, we propose a relational social-ecological framework as alternative to functional views of nature, quantitative interpretations of value and bipolar conceptions of human-nature relationships. Instead, we conceptualise the complementary and reciprocal relations between nature, human behaviour and governance in a 'landscape governance' triangle in which: the relationship between nature and behaviour is conceptualised as signification and identity; the relationship between nature and governance as ordering and generation; and the relationship between governance and behaviour as authority and agency. From this relational conception, it implies that landscape governance is more a matter of concern than only a matter of fact, according to Bruno Latour's proposal. We see this as the basis for an ethics of care that gives meaning to a relational social-ecological approach without losing the urgency of countering biodiversity loss and climate change. We illustrate our landscape governance triangle with examples from The Netherlands.

AMBIOVol. 55(1)
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Landscape governance as a matter of concern: A relational framework — Judith Westerink, Wim de Haas · AMBIO (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS