Longitudinal association between psychological distress and mask-wearing post COVID-19 among psychiatric outpatients in Japan

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted psychological distress globally and led to widespread behavioral changes, including mask-wearing. Research shows that mask-wearing behavior may have psychological consequences. Infection control behaviors and psychological distress are expected to decrease as the pandemic subsides. However, the effect of these changes on patients with mental illnesses remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of relaxed mask-wearing guidelines on psychological distress among psychiatric outpatients in Japan and its association with changes in mask-wearing behavior. It included 109 outpatients from a general hospital's psychiatric department. Psychological distress was assessed using the General Health Questionnaire-12 at two time points: before and after the guideline change. Mask-wearing behavior was recorded through self-reports. Changes in psychological distress were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and the association between changes in mask-wearing behavior and psychological distress was examined using multiple regression analysis, adjusting for preceding psychological distress, age, and gender. Among the 109 participants (12 with schizophrenia, 55 with mood disorders, 34 with anxiety disorders, and 8 with other conditions), a significant reduction in psychological distress was observed after the guideline relaxation (Cohen's d = 0.344, p < 0.01). Outdoor mask-wearing decreased from 89% before the guideline change to 65% after the change. Changes in mask-wearing behavior were significantly associated with reduced psychological distress (β = 2.72, p < 0.01). Relaxed mask-wearing guidelines positively impacted psychological distress among psychiatric outpatients, with unmasking associated with improved mental health. Thus, the relaxation of public health measures can contribute to improved mental health among vulnerable populations. This study provides new insights into the psychological implications of mask-wearing policies in the post-COVID-19 society and informs strategies to support mental health in future public health crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0329644
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Longitudinal association between psychological distress and mask-wearing post COVID-19 among psychiatric outpatients in Japan

Shinsuke Washizuka, Kazuhiro Suzuki, Daimei Sasayama, Yusuke Arai et al.
PLoS ONE
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Longitudinal association between psychological distress and mask-wearing post COVID-19 among psychiatric outpatients in Japan

Shinsuke Washizuka, Kazuhiro Suzuki, Daimei Sasayama, Yusuke Arai, Keitaro Miyamura, Yoshikuni Mizuno
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted psychological distress globally and led to widespread behavioral changes, including mask-wearing. Research shows that mask-wearing behavior may have psychological consequences. Infection control behaviors and psychological distress are expected to decrease as the pandemic subsides. However, the effect of these changes on patients with mental illnesses remains unclear. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of relaxed mask-wearing guidelines on psychological distress among psychiatric outpatients in Japan and its association with changes in mask-wearing behavior. It included 109 outpatients from a general hospital's psychiatric department. Psychological distress was assessed using the General Health Questionnaire-12 at two time points: before and after the guideline change. Mask-wearing behavior was recorded through self-reports. Changes in psychological distress were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and the association between changes in mask-wearing behavior and psychological distress was examined using multiple regression analysis, adjusting for preceding psychological distress, age, and gender. Among the 109 participants (12 with schizophrenia, 55 with mood disorders, 34 with anxiety disorders, and 8 with other conditions), a significant reduction in psychological distress was observed after the guideline relaxation (Cohen's d = 0.344, p < 0.01). Outdoor mask-wearing decreased from 89% before the guideline change to 65% after the change. Changes in mask-wearing behavior were significantly associated with reduced psychological distress (β = 2.72, p < 0.01). Relaxed mask-wearing guidelines positively impacted psychological distress among psychiatric outpatients, with unmasking associated with improved mental health. Thus, the relaxation of public health measures can contribute to improved mental health among vulnerable populations. This study provides new insights into the psychological implications of mask-wearing policies in the post-COVID-19 society and informs strategies to support mental health in future public health crises.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(8)
University of Fukui (JP), Shinshu University (JP), Kanto Central Hospital (JP), Kuma Hospital (JP), Center for Excellence in Education (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.