Down Syndrome in Maternity Care: Mothers' Experiences of Prenatal Screening

Prenatal screening for Down syndrome (DS) is offered to expectant parents receiving antenatal care in many countries, with an emphasis on providing parents with the opportunity to make informed choices about their pregnancy. We examined experiences of prenatal screening among mothers of children with DS living in England, Scotland, or Wales. Mothers (N = 317) of a child with DS born between 2019 and 2022 responded to an online survey and answered closed and open-ended questions about their experiences of being offered initial screening and non-invasive prenatal testing, and of receiving screening results. The findings from quantitative and qualitative analyses indicated that while most mothers understood screening was optional, many accepted initial screening with little consideration and most perceived it as routine. Many mothers reported receiving insufficient information about DS and limited support to help them make sense of screening results. Many mothers reported that screening results were not presented neutrally, and some highlighted how communication which reflected negative attitudes or assumptions about DS was highly memorable and impactful. The importance of personalized discussion to support mothers' understanding of screening, and to legitimize the option of declining screening tests, is discussed. The findings highlight the importance of a neutral approach to the delivery of both higher and lower chance screening results and of welcoming a diversity of choices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.64206
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Down Syndrome in Maternity Care: Mothers' Experiences of Prenatal Screening

Richard P. Hastings, Chris Stinton, Matthew J. Randell, Samantha Flynn et al.
1 citations
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
3.49
article

Down Syndrome in Maternity Care: Mothers' Experiences of Prenatal Screening

Richard P. Hastings, Chris Stinton, Matthew J. Randell, Samantha Flynn, Nicola Enoch, Tamar Rutter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Prenatal screening for Down syndrome (DS) is offered to expectant parents receiving antenatal care in many countries, with an emphasis on providing parents with the opportunity to make informed choices about their pregnancy. We examined experiences of prenatal screening among mothers of children with DS living in England, Scotland, or Wales. Mothers (N = 317) of a child with DS born between 2019 and 2022 responded to an online survey and answered closed and open-ended questions about their experiences of being offered initial screening and non-invasive prenatal testing, and of receiving screening results. The findings from quantitative and qualitative analyses indicated that while most mothers understood screening was optional, many accepted initial screening with little consideration and most perceived it as routine. Many mothers reported receiving insufficient information about DS and limited support to help them make sense of screening results. Many mothers reported that screening results were not presented neutrally, and some highlighted how communication which reflected negative attitudes or assumptions about DS was highly memorable and impactful. The importance of personalized discussion to support mothers' understanding of screening, and to legitimize the option of declining screening tests, is discussed. The findings highlight the importance of a neutral approach to the delivery of both higher and lower chance screening results and of welcoming a diversity of choices.

American Journal of Medical Genetics Part AVol. 200(1)
University of Warwick (GB), Leamington Spa Hospital (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.