Online prediction of optimal deep brain stimulation contacts from local field potentials in Parkinson’s disease

Selecting optimal contacts for chronic deep-brain stimulation (DBS) requires a monopolar review, involving time-consuming manual testing by trained personnel, often causing patient discomfort. Neural biomarkers, such as local field potentials (LFP), could streamline this process. This study aimed to validate LFP recordings from chronically implanted neurostimulators for guiding clinical contact-level selection. We retrospectively analysed bipolar LFP recordings from Parkinson's disease patients across three centres (Netherlands: 68, Switzerland: 21, Germany: 32). Using beta-band power measures (13-35 Hz), we ranked channels based on clinical contact-level choices and developed two prediction algorithms: (i) a "decision tree" method for in-clinic use and (ii) a "pattern based" method for offline validation. The "decision tree" method achieved accuracies of 86.5% (NL), 86.7% (CH), and 75.0% (DE) for predicting the top two contact-levels. Both methods outperformed an existing algorithm. These findings suggest LFP-based approaches can enhance DBS programming efficiency, potentially reducing patient burden and clinical workload.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Parkinson s Disease
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-025-01092-y
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Online prediction of optimal deep brain stimulation contacts from local field potentials in Parkinson’s disease

Maria Fiorella Contarino, C.F.E. Hoffmann, Ibrahem Hanafi, Niels A. van der Gaag et al.
6 citations
npj Parkinson s Disease
Neurological disorders and treatments
8.34
article

Online prediction of optimal deep brain stimulation contacts from local field potentials in Parkinson’s disease

Maria Fiorella Contarino, C.F.E. Hoffmann, Ibrahem Hanafi, Niels A. van der Gaag, Jocelyne Bloch, Mayté Castro Jiménez, Chiara Palmisano, Rodi Zutt, Ioannis U. Isaias, Camille Varescon, Stefano Scafa, Philipp Capetian, Saskia van der Gaag, Eduardo Martin Moraud, Julien F. Bally, Marjolein Muller
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Selecting optimal contacts for chronic deep-brain stimulation (DBS) requires a monopolar review, involving time-consuming manual testing by trained personnel, often causing patient discomfort. Neural biomarkers, such as local field potentials (LFP), could streamline this process. This study aimed to validate LFP recordings from chronically implanted neurostimulators for guiding clinical contact-level selection. We retrospectively analysed bipolar LFP recordings from Parkinson's disease patients across three centres (Netherlands: 68, Switzerland: 21, Germany: 32). Using beta-band power measures (13-35 Hz), we ranked channels based on clinical contact-level choices and developed two prediction algorithms: (i) a "decision tree" method for in-clinic use and (ii) a "pattern based" method for offline validation. The "decision tree" method achieved accuracies of 86.5% (NL), 86.7% (CH), and 75.0% (DE) for predicting the top two contact-levels. Both methods outperformed an existing algorithm. These findings suggest LFP-based approaches can enhance DBS programming efficiency, potentially reducing patient burden and clinical workload.

npj Parkinson s DiseaseVol. 11(1)
University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (CH), University of Würzburg (DE), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH), Medisch Centrum Haaglanden (NL), Istituto Ortopedico Gaetano Pini (IT), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE), Haga Hospital (NL), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), University of Lausanne (CH)
York University, European Commission, Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Fondazione Europea Ricerca Biomedica, School of Medicine, New York University, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Neurological disorders and treatments
8.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.