The Relationships Between Motivations and Different Forms of Online Trolling Among Early Adolescents: Gender Differences in Network Analysis

Online trolling is a behavior in which individuals deliberately and maliciously post messages to provoke arguments and conflicts. Previous studies have frequently overlooked the heterogeneity in online trolling motivations and gender differences. Moreover, many prior studies included participants who had not engaged in online trolling. This study employed network analysis to investigate the relationships between motivations and forms of online trolling, as well as gender differences, among early adolescents who engaged in online trolling. A total of 1,118 early adolescents (mean age = 12.19 ± 1.51 years) completed a set of validated questionnaires. The results showed that (a) in the full-sample network, revenge and rebutting for disagreement were strongly related to proactive (trolling initiated without any provocation from others) and reactive trolling (retaliatory responses to perceived provocation or external pressures); escaping from real life was strongly related to proactive and bystander trolling (just interested in observing trolling content, such as viewing, liking, or retweeting). Furthermore, we also identified unique predictors for each type of trolling: social manipulation was strongly related to proactive trolling; maintaining social justice was strongly related to reactive trolling; and experiencing thrill and self-entertainment were strongly related to bystander trolling. (b) Gender difference analyses revealed significant variations in the global network strength. Females exhibited significantly higher edge weights for rebutting for disagreement-revenge/reactive trolling/bystander trolling. Males exhibited significantly higher edge weights for rebutting for disagreement-social manipulation and maintaining social justice-bystander trolling. (c) The high bridge expected influence analysis identified gender-specific key nodes-revenge, experiencing thrill, and escaping from real life in the male network, and revenge and experiencing thrill in the female network. Through visualizing network associations and metrics, this study elucidates the relationships between online trolling motivations and their forms. The exploration of gender differences further provides a basis for understanding and mitigating early adolescents' online trolling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2025-08-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251360035
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Relationships Between Motivations and Different Forms of Online Trolling Among Early Adolescents: Gender Differences in Network Analysis

Xin Fang, Li Lei, Jundong Liao, Xinlong Sun et al.
2 citations
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
8.40
article

The Relationships Between Motivations and Different Forms of Online Trolling Among Early Adolescents: Gender Differences in Network Analysis

Xin Fang, Li Lei, Jundong Liao, Xinlong Sun, Fang Li
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Online trolling is a behavior in which individuals deliberately and maliciously post messages to provoke arguments and conflicts. Previous studies have frequently overlooked the heterogeneity in online trolling motivations and gender differences. Moreover, many prior studies included participants who had not engaged in online trolling. This study employed network analysis to investigate the relationships between motivations and forms of online trolling, as well as gender differences, among early adolescents who engaged in online trolling. A total of 1,118 early adolescents (mean age = 12.19 ± 1.51 years) completed a set of validated questionnaires. The results showed that (a) in the full-sample network, revenge and rebutting for disagreement were strongly related to proactive (trolling initiated without any provocation from others) and reactive trolling (retaliatory responses to perceived provocation or external pressures); escaping from real life was strongly related to proactive and bystander trolling (just interested in observing trolling content, such as viewing, liking, or retweeting). Furthermore, we also identified unique predictors for each type of trolling: social manipulation was strongly related to proactive trolling; maintaining social justice was strongly related to reactive trolling; and experiencing thrill and self-entertainment were strongly related to bystander trolling. (b) Gender difference analyses revealed significant variations in the global network strength. Females exhibited significantly higher edge weights for rebutting for disagreement-revenge/reactive trolling/bystander trolling. Males exhibited significantly higher edge weights for rebutting for disagreement-social manipulation and maintaining social justice-bystander trolling. (c) The high bridge expected influence analysis identified gender-specific key nodes-revenge, experiencing thrill, and escaping from real life in the male network, and revenge and experiencing thrill in the female network. Through visualizing network associations and metrics, this study elucidates the relationships between online trolling motivations and their forms. The exploration of gender differences further provides a basis for understanding and mitigating early adolescents' online trolling.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Sichuan Normal University (CN), Renmin University of China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.