How reliable is the labeling of a commercial phytosteroid product? A 12-week randomized double-blind training study

This study demonstrated that the prescribed resistance training protocol resulted in significant anabolic and performance-enhancing effects that did not differ between groups. The lack of group-specific differences suggests that the tested phytosteroid supplement did not provide additional benefits. The significant discrepancy between the claimed and actual 20E and DSG concentration resulted in the lack of biological activity in C2C12 cells and likely contributed to the absence of measurable group-specific effects. To enhance the reliability of future phytosteroid research, we strongly recommend: (1) verification of active compound concentrations in supplements, its actual content and absence of potential contamination with prohibited substances, (2) confirmation of their biological activity using <i>in vitro</i> models. Implementing these measures will help to minimize inconsistencies and enhance the reliability of future studies on phytosteroids.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15502783.2025.2540408
Primary Topic
Hormonal and reproductive studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How reliable is the labeling of a commercial phytosteroid product? A 12-week randomized double-blind training study

Patrick Rene Diel, Tim Havers, Joshua Dissemond, Tihomir Kostov et al.
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Hormonal and reproductive studies
article

How reliable is the labeling of a commercial phytosteroid product? A 12-week randomized double-blind training study

Patrick Rene Diel, Tim Havers, Joshua Dissemond, Tihomir Kostov, Steffen Held, Eduard Isenmann, Maria Kristina Parr, Stephan Geisler, Svea Alina Türschmann
article en

Abstract

This study demonstrated that the prescribed resistance training protocol resulted in significant anabolic and performance-enhancing effects that did not differ between groups. The lack of group-specific differences suggests that the tested phytosteroid supplement did not provide additional benefits. The significant discrepancy between the claimed and actual 20E and DSG concentration resulted in the lack of biological activity in C2C12 cells and likely contributed to the absence of measurable group-specific effects. To enhance the reliability of future phytosteroid research, we strongly recommend: (1) verification of active compound concentrations in supplements, its actual content and absence of potential contamination with prohibited substances, (2) confirmation of their biological activity using <i>in vitro</i> models. Implementing these measures will help to minimize inconsistencies and enhance the reliability of future studies on phytosteroids.

Journal of the International Society of Sports NutritionVol. 22(1)
German Sport University Cologne (DE), IST-Hochschule für Management (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Hochschule Düsseldorf University of Applied Sciences (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Hormonal and reproductive studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.