Managerial Consequences of the Algorithmic Determination of Incentive Decisions on Procedural Justice Perceptions in Production Line

This study investigates the managerial consequences of algorithm-based decision-making in incentive allocation on production line workers’ perceptions of procedural fairness. Grounded in organizational justice theory and the socio-technical systems framework, the research explores how algorithm transparency, process clarity, and perceived impartiality influence fairness judgments. Using a mixed-method approach, data were collected from 186 factory workers through surveys, complemented by in-depth interviews, and analyzed using structural equation modeling. The findings reveal that low algorithm transparency correlates negatively with perceptions of procedural fairness, while the absence of human involvement in decision-making reduces trust in managerial systems. These results emphasize the need for human-centered algorithm design and fair management practices to uphold employee trust and fairness in Industry 4.0 environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Management Analytics
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55927/ajma.v4i3.14997
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managerial Consequences of the Algorithmic Determination of Incentive Decisions on Procedural Justice Perceptions in Production Line

Heribertus Yudho Warsono, Dharma Widada, Sri Sumarliani
Asian Journal of Management Analytics
Digital Transformation in Industry
article

Managerial Consequences of the Algorithmic Determination of Incentive Decisions on Procedural Justice Perceptions in Production Line

Heribertus Yudho Warsono, Dharma Widada, Sri Sumarliani
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the managerial consequences of algorithm-based decision-making in incentive allocation on production line workers’ perceptions of procedural fairness. Grounded in organizational justice theory and the socio-technical systems framework, the research explores how algorithm transparency, process clarity, and perceived impartiality influence fairness judgments. Using a mixed-method approach, data were collected from 186 factory workers through surveys, complemented by in-depth interviews, and analyzed using structural equation modeling. The findings reveal that low algorithm transparency correlates negatively with perceptions of procedural fairness, while the absence of human involvement in decision-making reduces trust in managerial systems. These results emphasize the need for human-centered algorithm design and fair management practices to uphold employee trust and fairness in Industry 4.0 environments.

Asian Journal of Management AnalyticsVol. 4(3)
Mulawarman University (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Digital Transformation in Industry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Managerial Consequences of the Algorithmic Determination of Incentive Decisions on Procedural Justice Perceptions in Production Line — Heribertus Yudho Warsono, Dharma Widada, et al. · Asian Journal of Management Analytics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS