Feasibility and Acceptability of Virtual Dignity Therapy for Palliative Care Patients With Advanced Cancer

BackgroundPatients with advanced cancer experience a substantial amount of existential and emotional distress. Dignity therapy (DT) is a brief, individualized psychotherapy that aims to relieve existential distress and improve the experiences of individuals impacted by serious illness.AimTo evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of virtual DT (vDT) among patients with advanced cancer.MethodsThis pilot study recruited adult patients with advanced cancer and an expected prognosis >6 months. The vDT intervention consisted of 2 sessions of guided interviews focused on life review, discussion, and development of a generativity document (GD). Feasibility and acceptability were assessed quantitatively and with semi-structured interviews. Effectiveness measures (distress, dignity impact scale, quality of life [QOL]) were administered pre/post intervention.ResultsThirty-one patients referred from a palliative care clinic were eligible. Twenty-one consented and 15 received a final GD. Patients who completed final assessments (N = 9) reported satisfaction with their experience and would recommend the therapy to others. Patients found the virtual component of the intervention acceptable, and the majority noted an improvement in their dignity. Qualitative analysis revealed themes of study team effectiveness, perspectives on intervention processes, benefits to self, and benefits to loved ones.ConclusionParticipation in vDT intervention was feasible and acceptable for patients. Patients appreciated the connection with the interviewer, the process, and the benefit of having a document to share with loved ones. Preliminary effectiveness data suggest vDT improves sense of dignity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251361467
Primary Topic
Patient Dignity and Privacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility and Acceptability of Virtual Dignity Therapy for Palliative Care Patients With Advanced Cancer

A. Iglesias Santiago, Katherine M. Piderman, Sherry S. Chesak, Cory Ingram et al.
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Patient Dignity and Privacy
article

Feasibility and Acceptability of Virtual Dignity Therapy for Palliative Care Patients With Advanced Cancer

A. Iglesias Santiago, Katherine M. Piderman, Sherry S. Chesak, Cory Ingram, Jessica Weng, Laura Rhee, Deirdre R. Pachman, Karen M. Fischer, Melissa Felt, Ellen Wild, Caila J. Rinker
article en

Abstract

BackgroundPatients with advanced cancer experience a substantial amount of existential and emotional distress. Dignity therapy (DT) is a brief, individualized psychotherapy that aims to relieve existential distress and improve the experiences of individuals impacted by serious illness.AimTo evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of virtual DT (vDT) among patients with advanced cancer.MethodsThis pilot study recruited adult patients with advanced cancer and an expected prognosis >6 months. The vDT intervention consisted of 2 sessions of guided interviews focused on life review, discussion, and development of a generativity document (GD). Feasibility and acceptability were assessed quantitatively and with semi-structured interviews. Effectiveness measures (distress, dignity impact scale, quality of life [QOL]) were administered pre/post intervention.ResultsThirty-one patients referred from a palliative care clinic were eligible. Twenty-one consented and 15 received a final GD. Patients who completed final assessments (N = 9) reported satisfaction with their experience and would recommend the therapy to others. Patients found the virtual component of the intervention acceptable, and the majority noted an improvement in their dignity. Qualitative analysis revealed themes of study team effectiveness, perspectives on intervention processes, benefits to self, and benefits to loved ones.ConclusionParticipation in vDT intervention was feasible and acceptable for patients. Patients appreciated the connection with the interviewer, the process, and the benefit of having a document to share with loved ones. Preliminary effectiveness data suggest vDT improves sense of dignity.

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Mayo Clinic (US), WinnMed (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Patient Dignity and Privacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.