Outcomes after carotid revascularization for symptomatic carotid artery web: A multi-institutional cohort study

ObjectiveCarotid web can serve as a nidus for clot formation and subsequent thromboembolic stroke. Although treatment historically involved antiplatelet therapy, recent evidence demonstrates notably elevated recurrent stroke rates despite best medical therapy. We examined the safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS), which involves placing a coil in the artery, and carotid endarterectomy (CEA), a surgery to remove the clot, for treatment of symptomatic carotid web.MethodsA multi-institutional retrospective registry including adult patients with carotid web with history of ipsilateral acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) treated with either carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy was reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentation, treatment methodology, and outcomes at follow up were collected.ResultsAmong the 71 included patients (mean age 52.4 years, 44 (62.4%) female), 23 (32.4%) underwent CEA, and 48 (67.6%) underwent CAS. The most common presenting symptoms were hemibody numbness/weakness, aphasia, and gaze deviation. On average, patients had experienced 1.12 ± 0.7 strokes or TIAs before intervention, with a mean delay of 115 ± 224 days between initial stroke/TIA and intervention. The median preintervention modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was 2. Perioperatively, one patient (1.41%) experienced stroke and none experienced myocardial infarction. During mean 14.8 (±29.2)-month follow up, one patient experienced asymptomatic recurrent stroke (1.41%). Median mRS at follow up was 1, and carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy demonstrated similar rates of postoperative complication and recurrent stroke rates.ConclusionOur results suggest that endarterectomy and stenting are safe and efficacious for minimizing subsequent stroke risk in patients who have experienced stroke or TIA from carotid webbing, warranting further studies to determine the optimal timing and method of treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interventional Neuroradiology
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251365529
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes after carotid revascularization for symptomatic carotid artery web: A multi-institutional cohort study

Matthew N. Anderson, Visish Mani Srinivasan, Christopher R. Pasarikovski, Brian M. Howard et al.
6 citations
Interventional Neuroradiology
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
9.11
article

Outcomes after carotid revascularization for symptomatic carotid artery web: A multi-institutional cohort study

Matthew N. Anderson, Visish Mani Srinivasan, Christopher R. Pasarikovski, Brian M. Howard, Bachar El Baba, Ramesh Grandhi, Ronit Agid, Michael R. Levitt, Philipp Hendrix, Karl L. Sangwon, Jacob Cherian, Avi A. Gajjar, Allison Liang, T Bielinski, Michael T. Bounajem, Yuchong Zhang, Victor X. D. Yang, Annie Trang, Erez Nossek, Michael Reid Gooch, Daniel D. Wiggan, Eric A. Grin, Isaac Josh Abecassis, R. Michael Meyer
article en
6 citations

Abstract

ObjectiveCarotid web can serve as a nidus for clot formation and subsequent thromboembolic stroke. Although treatment historically involved antiplatelet therapy, recent evidence demonstrates notably elevated recurrent stroke rates despite best medical therapy. We examined the safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS), which involves placing a coil in the artery, and carotid endarterectomy (CEA), a surgery to remove the clot, for treatment of symptomatic carotid web.MethodsA multi-institutional retrospective registry including adult patients with carotid web with history of ipsilateral acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) treated with either carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy was reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentation, treatment methodology, and outcomes at follow up were collected.ResultsAmong the 71 included patients (mean age 52.4 years, 44 (62.4%) female), 23 (32.4%) underwent CEA, and 48 (67.6%) underwent CAS. The most common presenting symptoms were hemibody numbness/weakness, aphasia, and gaze deviation. On average, patients had experienced 1.12 ± 0.7 strokes or TIAs before intervention, with a mean delay of 115 ± 224 days between initial stroke/TIA and intervention. The median preintervention modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was 2. Perioperatively, one patient (1.41%) experienced stroke and none experienced myocardial infarction. During mean 14.8 (±29.2)-month follow up, one patient experienced asymptomatic recurrent stroke (1.41%). Median mRS at follow up was 1, and carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy demonstrated similar rates of postoperative complication and recurrent stroke rates.ConclusionOur results suggest that endarterectomy and stenting are safe and efficacious for minimizing subsequent stroke risk in patients who have experienced stroke or TIA from carotid webbing, warranting further studies to determine the optimal timing and method of treatment.

Interventional Neuroradiology
Western University (CA), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University Health Network (CA), University of Louisville (US), Thomas Jefferson University (US), Emory University (US), University of Washington (US), Queen's University (CA), University of Utah (US), Toronto Western Hospital (CA), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US), London Health Sciences Centre (CA), NYU Langone Health (US), Health Center (US), University of Pennsylvania Health System (US), Neurological Surgery (US), Geisinger Health System (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Renal and Vascular Pathologies
9.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.