Feasibility and Challenges of Low-Carbon Transition of China’s Power System

Low-carbon transition of China's power system is pivotal for global climate management. National aggregate analysis in prior work (10.1038/s41560-021-00863-0, 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.09.012, 10.1038/s41558-019-0509-6, 10.1038/s41558-022-01570-8 , 10.1093/ooenergy/oiad009) masks the conflicts between China's power system mechanism, carbon mitigation, and economic development goals and conceals provincial heterogeneities in socioeconomic capabilities, costs, and risks. We address those issues by comparing decline in coal use and acceleration in renewable adoption rates (R<sub>CHI</sub>) in China's provinces along with China's 2030-2060 carbon mitigation and economic development goals to that in 52 other countries at their historical fastest transformation (R<sub>MAX</sub>) decade, based on their socioeconomic, power system structure, and mechanism conditions, and quantifying the unit-associated unemployment and stranded assets due to decline in coal use. We observed that R<sub>CHI</sub> distributes unevenly in time and space. In time scale, the transition follows a "fast-then-slow" trajectory in terms of stranded assets, leading to higher socioeconomic and political efforts at the beginning of the process. Spatially, certain provinces face heightened risks related to stranded assets, unemployment, and energy security, underscoring the urgent need for power system reforms and equitable carbon quota allocations for a just transition. To achieve its 2030-2060 carbon targets, China must attain higher R<sub>CHI</sub> than R<sub>MAX</sub>, overcoming stringent socioeconomic and political challenges and entrenched system inertia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c03894
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility and Challenges of Low-Carbon Transition of China’s Power System

Tenghu Wu, Tianwei Tan, Huimin Yun, Xiaotao Bi
2 citations
Environmental Science & Technology
Global Energy Security and Policy
3.58
article

Feasibility and Challenges of Low-Carbon Transition of China’s Power System

Tenghu Wu, Tianwei Tan, Huimin Yun, Xiaotao Bi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Low-carbon transition of China's power system is pivotal for global climate management. National aggregate analysis in prior work (10.1038/s41560-021-00863-0, 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.09.012, 10.1038/s41558-019-0509-6, 10.1038/s41558-022-01570-8 , 10.1093/ooenergy/oiad009) masks the conflicts between China's power system mechanism, carbon mitigation, and economic development goals and conceals provincial heterogeneities in socioeconomic capabilities, costs, and risks. We address those issues by comparing decline in coal use and acceleration in renewable adoption rates (R<sub>CHI</sub>) in China's provinces along with China's 2030-2060 carbon mitigation and economic development goals to that in 52 other countries at their historical fastest transformation (R<sub>MAX</sub>) decade, based on their socioeconomic, power system structure, and mechanism conditions, and quantifying the unit-associated unemployment and stranded assets due to decline in coal use. We observed that R<sub>CHI</sub> distributes unevenly in time and space. In time scale, the transition follows a "fast-then-slow" trajectory in terms of stranded assets, leading to higher socioeconomic and political efforts at the beginning of the process. Spatially, certain provinces face heightened risks related to stranded assets, unemployment, and energy security, underscoring the urgent need for power system reforms and equitable carbon quota allocations for a just transition. To achieve its 2030-2060 carbon targets, China must attain higher R<sub>CHI</sub> than R<sub>MAX</sub>, overcoming stringent socioeconomic and political challenges and entrenched system inertia.

Environmental Science & TechnologyVol. 59(32)
University of British Columbia (CA), Intelligent Synthetic Biology Center (KR), Green Technology (US), Clean Energy (United States) (US), Beijing Ditan Hospital (CN), Green Chemistry (PL), Life University (US), Beijing University of Chemical Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Global Energy Security and Policy
3.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.