Evidence Factors in Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Designs with Sequential Treatment Assignments

Many observational studies often involve multiple levels of treatment assignment. In particular, fuzzy regression discontinuity (RD) designs have sequential treatment assignment processes: first based on eligibility criteria, and second, on (non-)compliance rules. In such fuzzy RD designs, researchers typically use either an intent-to-treat approach or an instrumental variable-type approach, and each is subject to both overlapping and unique biases. This article proposes a new evidence factors (EFs) framework for fuzzy RD designs with sequential treatment assignments, which may be influenced by different levels of decision-makers. Each of the proposed EFs aims to test the same causal null hypothesis while potentially being subject to different types of biases. Our proposed framework utilizes the local RD randomization and randomization-based inference. We evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed framework through simulation studies and two real datasets on pre-kindergarten programs and testing accommodations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychometrika
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psy.2025.10033
Primary Topic
Fuzzy Systems and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence Factors in Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Designs with Sequential Treatment Assignments

Youmi Suk, Youjin Lee
Psychometrika
Fuzzy Systems and Optimization
article

Evidence Factors in Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Designs with Sequential Treatment Assignments

Youmi Suk, Youjin Lee
article en

Abstract

Many observational studies often involve multiple levels of treatment assignment. In particular, fuzzy regression discontinuity (RD) designs have sequential treatment assignment processes: first based on eligibility criteria, and second, on (non-)compliance rules. In such fuzzy RD designs, researchers typically use either an intent-to-treat approach or an instrumental variable-type approach, and each is subject to both overlapping and unique biases. This article proposes a new evidence factors (EFs) framework for fuzzy RD designs with sequential treatment assignments, which may be influenced by different levels of decision-makers. Each of the proposed EFs aims to test the same causal null hypothesis while potentially being subject to different types of biases. Our proposed framework utilizes the local RD randomization and randomization-based inference. We evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed framework through simulation studies and two real datasets on pre-kindergarten programs and testing accommodations.

PsychometrikaVol. 90(4)
John Brown University (US), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Fuzzy Systems and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evidence Factors in Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Designs with Sequential Treatment Assignments — Youmi Suk, Youjin Lee · Psychometrika (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS