Real world effectiveness of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies over three consecutive one-year treatment cycles: An intention-to-treat analysis

BackgroundThe present prospective, real-world study aims to assess anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) effectiveness across three consecutive one-year treatment cycles by means of a conservative intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis.MethodsWe enrolled 179 subjects (75.4% females, 51.3 years 95% confidence interval [49.2-53.4] years), 87.2% with chronic migraine and medication overuse) who started mAbs between 2018 and 2020. We recorded clinical data supported by a prospectively filled headache diary up to three one-year treatment cycles. The ITT analysis was performed with a multivariate linear mixed model considering the entire population.ResultsWe observed a marked and consistent reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs) across the three one-year cycles of treatment: -12.7 )[-11.4 - -14.1] at end of the first year of treatment (C1), -12.4 [-11.0 - -13.8] at the end of the second year (C2) and -12.9 [-11.4 - -14.3] at the end of the third year (C3). Baseline and residual MMDs progressively decreased across the three cycles (<i>p</i> <i>=</i> 0.008): from 21.1 [19.8-22.4] to 9.6 [8.3-11.0] in C1, from 19.0 [17.4-20.5] to 9.6 [8.1-11.1] in C2, and from 15.9 [14.3-17.5] to 8.5 [6.9-10.1] in C3. At the end of C3, the 50% response rate was 38.5% (69/179)<i>.</i>ConclusionsIn our cohort, mAbs induced a meaningful and sustained reduction in MMDs across three consecutive one-year cycles of treatment. The ITT analysis revealed a remaining high burden of disease. While confirming mAbs effectiveness in migraine prevention, these findings underscore the need for more treatment approaches and for exploring other non-CGRP dependent pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cephalalgia
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251353421
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Migraine and Headache Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real world effectiveness of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies over three consecutive one-year treatment cycles: An intention-to-treat analysis

Elena Guaschino, Grazia Sances, Francescantonio Cammarota, Federico Bighiani et al.
4 citations
Cephalalgia
Migraine and Headache Studies
5.88
article

Real world effectiveness of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies over three consecutive one-year treatment cycles: An intention-to-treat analysis

Elena Guaschino, Grazia Sances, Francescantonio Cammarota, Federico Bighiani, Licia Grazzi, Luca Costantino, Sara Bottiroli, Cristina Tassorelli, Cristina Montomoli, Michele Corrado, Alessandro Antoniazzi, Roberto De Icco, Daniele Martinelli, Maria Magdalena Pocora, Luigi Francesco Iannone, Gloria Vaghi, Marta Allena, Francesco De Cesaris, Danilo Antonio Montisano, Ghiotto Natascia
article en
4 citations

Abstract

BackgroundThe present prospective, real-world study aims to assess anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) effectiveness across three consecutive one-year treatment cycles by means of a conservative intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis.MethodsWe enrolled 179 subjects (75.4% females, 51.3 years 95% confidence interval [49.2-53.4] years), 87.2% with chronic migraine and medication overuse) who started mAbs between 2018 and 2020. We recorded clinical data supported by a prospectively filled headache diary up to three one-year treatment cycles. The ITT analysis was performed with a multivariate linear mixed model considering the entire population.ResultsWe observed a marked and consistent reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs) across the three one-year cycles of treatment: -12.7 )[-11.4 - -14.1] at end of the first year of treatment (C1), -12.4 [-11.0 - -13.8] at the end of the second year (C2) and -12.9 [-11.4 - -14.3] at the end of the third year (C3). Baseline and residual MMDs progressively decreased across the three cycles (<i>p</i> <i>=</i> 0.008): from 21.1 [19.8-22.4] to 9.6 [8.3-11.0] in C1, from 19.0 [17.4-20.5] to 9.6 [8.1-11.1] in C2, and from 15.9 [14.3-17.5] to 8.5 [6.9-10.1] in C3. At the end of C3, the 50% response rate was 38.5% (69/179)<i>.</i>ConclusionsIn our cohort, mAbs induced a meaningful and sustained reduction in MMDs across three consecutive one-year cycles of treatment. The ITT analysis revealed a remaining high burden of disease. While confirming mAbs effectiveness in migraine prevention, these findings underscore the need for more treatment approaches and for exploring other non-CGRP dependent pathways.

CephalalgiaVol. 45(8)
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), University of Pavia (IT), Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Nazionale Casimiro Mondino (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (IT)
Ministero della Salute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Migraine and Headache Studies
5.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.