Neural speech tracking in noise reflects the opposing influence of SNR on intelligibility and attentional effort

Understanding speech in noise depends on several interacting factors, including the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), speech intelligibility (SI), and attentional engagement. However, how these factors relate to selective neural speech tracking remains unclear. In this study, we recorded EEG and eye-tracking data while participants performed a selective listening task involving a target talker in the presence of a competing masker talker and background noise across a wide range of SNRs. Our results revealed a non-linear relationship, where neural tracking of the target speech first increased with SNR but then paradoxically decreased as SNR continued to improve. To explain this, we quantified SI behaviorally, estimated attentional effort (AE) using gaze velocity, and measured behavioral performance (BP) via a repeated-word detection task. Our analysis showed that neural tracking of the target speech increased with both SI and attentional engagement. However, when intelligibility reached ceiling levels, selective neural speech tracking decreased as AE declined. Statistical modeling indicated that SI and AE were reliable predictors of neural tracking, while SNR showed no independent contribution after accounting for these factors. Our results demonstrate that improved SNR influences selective neural speech tracking primarily by increasing SI and simultaneously reducing AE, which have opposing effects on neural tracking. These findings underscore the importance of jointly considering these factors in studies of speech perception in noise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Imaging Neuroscience
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.126
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural speech tracking in noise reflects the opposing influence of SNR on intelligibility and attentional effort

Nima Mesgarani, Vinay Raghavan, Xiaomin He
Imaging Neuroscience
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Neural speech tracking in noise reflects the opposing influence of SNR on intelligibility and attentional effort

Nima Mesgarani, Vinay Raghavan, Xiaomin He
article en

Abstract

Understanding speech in noise depends on several interacting factors, including the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), speech intelligibility (SI), and attentional engagement. However, how these factors relate to selective neural speech tracking remains unclear. In this study, we recorded EEG and eye-tracking data while participants performed a selective listening task involving a target talker in the presence of a competing masker talker and background noise across a wide range of SNRs. Our results revealed a non-linear relationship, where neural tracking of the target speech first increased with SNR but then paradoxically decreased as SNR continued to improve. To explain this, we quantified SI behaviorally, estimated attentional effort (AE) using gaze velocity, and measured behavioral performance (BP) via a repeated-word detection task. Our analysis showed that neural tracking of the target speech increased with both SI and attentional engagement. However, when intelligibility reached ceiling levels, selective neural speech tracking decreased as AE declined. Statistical modeling indicated that SI and AE were reliable predictors of neural tracking, while SNR showed no independent contribution after accounting for these factors. Our results demonstrate that improved SNR influences selective neural speech tracking primarily by increasing SI and simultaneously reducing AE, which have opposing effects on neural tracking. These findings underscore the importance of jointly considering these factors in studies of speech perception in noise.

Imaging NeuroscienceVol. 3
Columbia University (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.