More similarity than difference: Comparison of within- and between-sex variance in early adolescent brain structure

Adolescent neuroimaging studies of sex differences in the human brain predominantly examine average differences between males and females. This focus on mean differences without probing relative distributions and similarities may contribute to both conflation and overestimation of sex differences and sexual dimorphism in the developing human brain. We aimed to characterize the variance in brain macro- and micro-structure in early adolescence as it pertains to sex at birth using a large sample of 9-11-year-olds from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (N = 7,723). For global and regional estimates of gray and white matter volume, cortical thickness, and white matter microstructure (i.e., fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity), we examined: within- and between-sex variance, overlap between male and female distributions, inhomogeneity of variance, effect size, and CLES. We examined these sex differences using both unadjusted (raw) brain estimates and residualized brain estimates from mixed-effects modeling (adjusted) to account for variance better attributed to age, pubertal development, socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, MRI scanner manufacturer, and total brain volume, where applicable. Contrary to the popular view of the brain as sexually dimorphic, we found high similarity and low difference between sexes in all regional measurements of brain structure examined after accounting for other sources of variance. However, the sex difference for adjusted total brain volume (TBV) had a medium effect size and a 71.9% probability that a randomly chosen male adolescent would have a larger brain than a randomly chosen female adolescent. All cortical and subcortical volumes showed significant inhomogeneity of variance between sexes, whereas a minority of brain regions showed significant sex differences in variance for cortical thickness, white matter volume, fractional anisotropy, and mean diffusivity. Previously reported sex differences in early adolescent regional human brain volume may, therefore, be driven by disparities in variance, rather than binary, sex-based phenotypes. This study builds upon previous findings illustrating the importance of considering variance when examining sex differences in brain structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Imaging Neuroscience
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.127
Primary Topic
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

More similarity than difference: Comparison of within- and between-sex variance in early adolescent brain structure

Megan M. Herting, Jeiran Choupan, Katherine L. Bottenhorn, Hedyeh Ahmadi et al.
Imaging Neuroscience
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
article

More similarity than difference: Comparison of within- and between-sex variance in early adolescent brain structure

Megan M. Herting, Jeiran Choupan, Katherine L. Bottenhorn, Hedyeh Ahmadi, Carinna M. Torgerson
article en

Abstract

Adolescent neuroimaging studies of sex differences in the human brain predominantly examine average differences between males and females. This focus on mean differences without probing relative distributions and similarities may contribute to both conflation and overestimation of sex differences and sexual dimorphism in the developing human brain. We aimed to characterize the variance in brain macro- and micro-structure in early adolescence as it pertains to sex at birth using a large sample of 9-11-year-olds from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (N = 7,723). For global and regional estimates of gray and white matter volume, cortical thickness, and white matter microstructure (i.e., fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity), we examined: within- and between-sex variance, overlap between male and female distributions, inhomogeneity of variance, effect size, and CLES. We examined these sex differences using both unadjusted (raw) brain estimates and residualized brain estimates from mixed-effects modeling (adjusted) to account for variance better attributed to age, pubertal development, socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, MRI scanner manufacturer, and total brain volume, where applicable. Contrary to the popular view of the brain as sexually dimorphic, we found high similarity and low difference between sexes in all regional measurements of brain structure examined after accounting for other sources of variance. However, the sex difference for adjusted total brain volume (TBV) had a medium effect size and a 71.9% probability that a randomly chosen male adolescent would have a larger brain than a randomly chosen female adolescent. All cortical and subcortical volumes showed significant inhomogeneity of variance between sexes, whereas a minority of brain regions showed significant sex differences in variance for cortical thickness, white matter volume, fractional anisotropy, and mean diffusivity. Previously reported sex differences in early adolescent regional human brain volume may, therefore, be driven by disparities in variance, rather than binary, sex-based phenotypes. This study builds upon previous findings illustrating the importance of considering variance when examining sex differences in brain structure.

Imaging NeuroscienceVol. 3
University of Southern California (US), ScienceScope (United Kingdom) (GB)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Cognitive Abilities and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.