A Multidimensional Assessment of Waste-to-Energy Technologies: Economic Feasibility, Social Acceptance, and Future Trends of Gasification and Pyrolysis

The global increase in municipal solid waste, projected to reach 3.4 billion tons annually by 2050, poses a critical environmental and energy challenge for both developed and developing nations. Waste-to-Energy (WTE) technologies represent a critical approach to addressing global waste management and energy sustainability challenges. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of four prominent WTE technologies: Incineration, Anaerobic Digestion, Gasification, and Pyrolysis, evaluating their energy efficiency, environmental impact, economic feasibility, and socio-economic viability. Comparative analysis reveals that Anaerobic Digestion achieves the highest environmental benefits with low carbon emissions (200 kg/ton) and moderate capital costs (USD 600/ton), while Gasification offers superior energy recovery rates (90%) and carbon reduction (35%). Pyrolysis demonstrates remarkable feedstock flexibility and low methane emissions (5 kg/ton), making it a versatile option for diverse waste streams. Incineration, despite being widely adopted, faces challenges related to high emissions (900 kg CO2/ton) and ash residue management. Economically, Anaerobic Digestion has the shortest payback period (7 years) and highest return on investment (35%), while Gasification and Pyrolysis require higher capital but offer long-term stability and moderate risk factors. Social acceptance varies, with Anaerobic Digestion achieving the highest public approval (80%) due to minimal health and environmental concerns. Regionally, policy support in Europe and North America significantly drives WTE adoption, while Africa faces gaps in regulatory enforcement and incentives. Future trends highlight increased investment in research, pilot projects, and innovation, particularly in biochar utilization and advanced catalyst technologies. This study highlights the importance of tailored regional policies, financial incentives, and public awareness campaigns to enhance WTE adoption and ensure sustainable socio-economic benefits globally. The findings advocate for an integrated approach to optimize WTE technologies for a cleaner and more energy-efficient future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36287/ijmsit.9.1.3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Municipal Solid Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multidimensional Assessment of Waste-to-Energy Technologies: Economic Feasibility, Social Acceptance, and Future Trends of Gasification and Pyrolysis

Osagie Imevbore Ihenyen, Dıckson Davıd Olodu, Andrew Erameh
1 citations
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies
Municipal Solid Waste Management
1.00
article

A Multidimensional Assessment of Waste-to-Energy Technologies: Economic Feasibility, Social Acceptance, and Future Trends of Gasification and Pyrolysis

Osagie Imevbore Ihenyen, Dıckson Davıd Olodu, Andrew Erameh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The global increase in municipal solid waste, projected to reach 3.4 billion tons annually by 2050, poses a critical environmental and energy challenge for both developed and developing nations. Waste-to-Energy (WTE) technologies represent a critical approach to addressing global waste management and energy sustainability challenges. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of four prominent WTE technologies: Incineration, Anaerobic Digestion, Gasification, and Pyrolysis, evaluating their energy efficiency, environmental impact, economic feasibility, and socio-economic viability. Comparative analysis reveals that Anaerobic Digestion achieves the highest environmental benefits with low carbon emissions (200 kg/ton) and moderate capital costs (USD 600/ton), while Gasification offers superior energy recovery rates (90%) and carbon reduction (35%). Pyrolysis demonstrates remarkable feedstock flexibility and low methane emissions (5 kg/ton), making it a versatile option for diverse waste streams. Incineration, despite being widely adopted, faces challenges related to high emissions (900 kg CO2/ton) and ash residue management. Economically, Anaerobic Digestion has the shortest payback period (7 years) and highest return on investment (35%), while Gasification and Pyrolysis require higher capital but offer long-term stability and moderate risk factors. Social acceptance varies, with Anaerobic Digestion achieving the highest public approval (80%) due to minimal health and environmental concerns. Regionally, policy support in Europe and North America significantly drives WTE adoption, while Africa faces gaps in regulatory enforcement and incentives. Future trends highlight increased investment in research, pilot projects, and innovation, particularly in biochar utilization and advanced catalyst technologies. This study highlights the importance of tailored regional policies, financial incentives, and public awareness campaigns to enhance WTE adoption and ensure sustainable socio-economic benefits globally. The findings advocate for an integrated approach to optimize WTE technologies for a cleaner and more energy-efficient future.

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative TechnologiesVol. 9(1)
Benson Idahosa University (NG), University of Science and Technology of Benin (BJ), Igbinedion University (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Municipal Solid Waste Management
1.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.