Industrial Policy in China

This paper quantifies the size of the main industrial policy instruments in China and estimates their impact on domestic factor misallocation and aggregate productivity. The quantification of industrial policy instruments leverages data from financial reports of listed firms and the land registry. The equivalent fiscal cost of industrial policy through cash subsidies, tax benefits, subsidized credit, and subsidized land for favored sectors (including both private and state-owned firms) is estimated at about 4 percent of GDP per year, with a growing share of tax benefits over time. Next, the paper uses a structural model to estimate the relationship between industrial policies and factor misallocation for a broad sample of firms. Various industrial policy instruments are found to affect factor allocations in different ways—subsidies tend to lead to excess production, while trade and regulatory barriers limit production. Overall, factor misallocation from industrial policies is estimated to reduce domestic aggregate TFP by about 1.2 percent. The results resonate with IMF policy recommendations for China to scale back industrial policy and increase its transparency.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
IMF Working Paper
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229017855.001
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Industrial Policy in China

Yifan Tao, S.P. Kothari, Daniel Garcia-Macia
3 citations
IMF Working Paper
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
9.39
article

Industrial Policy in China

Yifan Tao, S.P. Kothari, Daniel Garcia-Macia
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper quantifies the size of the main industrial policy instruments in China and estimates their impact on domestic factor misallocation and aggregate productivity. The quantification of industrial policy instruments leverages data from financial reports of listed firms and the land registry. The equivalent fiscal cost of industrial policy through cash subsidies, tax benefits, subsidized credit, and subsidized land for favored sectors (including both private and state-owned firms) is estimated at about 4 percent of GDP per year, with a growing share of tax benefits over time. Next, the paper uses a structural model to estimate the relationship between industrial policies and factor misallocation for a broad sample of firms. Various industrial policy instruments are found to affect factor allocations in different ways—subsidies tend to lead to excess production, while trade and regulatory barriers limit production. Overall, factor misallocation from industrial policies is estimated to reduce domestic aggregate TFP by about 1.2 percent. The results resonate with IMF policy recommendations for China to scale back industrial policy and increase its transparency.

IMF Working PaperVol. 2025(155)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Industrial Policy in China — Yifan Tao, S.P. Kothari, et al. · IMF Working Paper (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS