Seasonal dynamics of the nutritive value of temperate forage trees differ among species

Abstract There is growing interest in using temperate forage trees to alleviate the effects of summer drought and heatwaves on herbaceous forage. However, forage trees remain understudied in temperate climates. We studied the seasonal variation of the nutritive value of 16 tree species commonly found in Western Europe. We collected 285 samples of tree leaves between spring and autumn (June, August and October) over three years at 14 sites across France. We measured seven nutritive characteristics: in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and the contents of crude protein (CP), dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), and ash. We used linear mixed models to analyse their seasonal variation and then clustered the species based on CP and IVDMD. CP content and IVDMD generally decreased from spring to autumn (by 26% and 6 percentage points), while DM and ash contents increased (by 42 and 32%). Corylus avellana , Morus alba , and Robinia pseudoacacia had the greatest CP content (from 138 to 250 g.kg −1 ), and M. alba had the greatest IVDMD (84.7% on average). We observed a trade-off between CP and IVDMD among clusters. The order of clusters based on their nutritive value remained consistent across seasons. Our findings highlight the importance of carefully planning tree use, as their nutritive value varies substantially among species and across seasons. Results provide new opportunities for farmers to compensate for the lack of herbaceous forage in summer, even though yield and palatability aspects remain to be studied.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agroforestry Systems
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01258-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seasonal dynamics of the nutritive value of temperate forage trees differ among species

Philippe Barré, Rémy Delagarde, Sandra Novak, Geoffrey Mesbahi et al.
1 citations
Agroforestry Systems
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
1.90
article

Seasonal dynamics of the nutritive value of temperate forage trees differ among species

Philippe Barré, Rémy Delagarde, Sandra Novak, Geoffrey Mesbahi, Cécile Ginane
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract There is growing interest in using temperate forage trees to alleviate the effects of summer drought and heatwaves on herbaceous forage. However, forage trees remain understudied in temperate climates. We studied the seasonal variation of the nutritive value of 16 tree species commonly found in Western Europe. We collected 285 samples of tree leaves between spring and autumn (June, August and October) over three years at 14 sites across France. We measured seven nutritive characteristics: in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and the contents of crude protein (CP), dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), and ash. We used linear mixed models to analyse their seasonal variation and then clustered the species based on CP and IVDMD. CP content and IVDMD generally decreased from spring to autumn (by 26% and 6 percentage points), while DM and ash contents increased (by 42 and 32%). Corylus avellana , Morus alba , and Robinia pseudoacacia had the greatest CP content (from 138 to 250 g.kg −1 ), and M. alba had the greatest IVDMD (84.7% on average). We observed a trade-off between CP and IVDMD among clusters. The order of clusters based on their nutritive value remained consistent across seasons. Our findings highlight the importance of carefully planning tree use, as their nutritive value varies substantially among species and across seasons. Results provide new opportunities for farmers to compensate for the lack of herbaceous forage in summer, even though yield and palatability aspects remain to be studied.

Agroforestry SystemsVol. 99(6)
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage (FR), Unité Mixte de Recherche sur les Herbivores (FR), Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Prairies et Plantes Fourragères (FR), Forschungsinstitut für Biologischen Landbau (CH), L'Institut Agro (FR)
European Commission, Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Energie, Fondation de France, Ministère de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement, Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
1.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.