Measuring the general public artificial intelligence attitudes and literacy: Measurement scales validation by national multistage omnibus survey in Bulgaria

This study examines public attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) and self-perceived AI literacy in Bulgaria, using two validated instruments: the General Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS) and the Meta AI Literacy Scale (MAILS). Administered within a national multistage omnibus survey (N = 1006), the study represents the first large-scale assessment of AI-related perceptions in an Eastern European context. The research has a dual focus: to test the psychometric performance of both scales in a new linguistic and methodological setting, and to explore how AI attitudes and literacy are distributed across key sociodemographic groups. Both GAAIS and MAILS demonstrate strong internal consistency in the face-to-face survey setting, supporting their applicability beyond online convenience samples. ANOVA and regression analyses reveal that education and age are significant predictors of AI literacy, while positive AI attitudes also vary by gender. In contrast, negative attitudes appear more evenly distributed, reflecting broader societal concerns. The results confirm the conceptual distinction between attitudes and perceived literacy, and demonstrate the benefit of administering the two instruments in parallel. The study offers a multidimensional approach to measuring public AI readiness and contributes a validated framework for future cross-cultural and policy-oriented research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100193
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the general public artificial intelligence attitudes and literacy: Measurement scales validation by national multistage omnibus survey in Bulgaria

Gabriela Yordanova, Екатерина Маркова
1 citations
Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Measuring the general public artificial intelligence attitudes and literacy: Measurement scales validation by national multistage omnibus survey in Bulgaria

Gabriela Yordanova, Екатерина Маркова
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examines public attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) and self-perceived AI literacy in Bulgaria, using two validated instruments: the General Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS) and the Meta AI Literacy Scale (MAILS). Administered within a national multistage omnibus survey (N = 1006), the study represents the first large-scale assessment of AI-related perceptions in an Eastern European context. The research has a dual focus: to test the psychometric performance of both scales in a new linguistic and methodological setting, and to explore how AI attitudes and literacy are distributed across key sociodemographic groups. Both GAAIS and MAILS demonstrate strong internal consistency in the face-to-face survey setting, supporting their applicability beyond online convenience samples. ANOVA and regression analyses reveal that education and age are significant predictors of AI literacy, while positive AI attitudes also vary by gender. In contrast, negative attitudes appear more evenly distributed, reflecting broader societal concerns. The results confirm the conceptual distinction between attitudes and perceived literacy, and demonstrate the benefit of administering the two instruments in parallel. The study offers a multidimensional approach to measuring public AI readiness and contributes a validated framework for future cross-cultural and policy-oriented research.

Computers in Human Behavior Artificial HumansVol. 5
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG)
Ministry of Education and Science
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.