Biodiversity monitoring in urban community gardens using proximal sensing and drone remote sensing

In urban community gardens, artificially managed ground cover types, including vegetative and non-vegetative ground components, are both critical to ecological functioning. Yet, how these non-vegetative components influence spectral diversity in ways that are different from natural systems has not been addressed. This study investigated the potential of combining spectral and structural diversity variables, corresponding to the Spectral Variation and Height Variation Hypotheses, respectively, to monitor plant and ground cover diversity. These variables were derived from in situ hyperspectral measurements, drone-based multispectral imagery, and three-dimensional canopy height models. We examined four biodiversity variables, including plant species richness, total plant abundances, ground cover entropy, and ground cover richness, across five urban community gardens over two years. Spectral diversity was calculated based on the Coefficient of Variation (CV), Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM), and Shannon’s Entropy (Entropy) indices at multiple spectral ranges. Structural diversity variables, including canopy height variation and image texture features. Our results showed that Red-Edge and Near-infrared (NIR) bands effectively captured compositional variation in ground cover, while visible wavelengths better reflected subtle differences in vegetative components. Texture features and height-based structural variables provided valuable insights into canopy complexity, particularly improving predictions of plant abundance and ground cover entropy. Finally, we found that integrating spectral and structural diversity variables further enhanced predictive performance due to considering canopy biochemical and structural differences. This multi-metric approach outperformed single-source analyses, underscoring the value of combining complementary remote sensing data for better interpreting urban garden biodiversity. Our findings highlight the importance of characterizing canopy structural heterogeneity in advancing biodiversity monitoring within these complex urban ecosystems. • Non-vegetative ground cover components influence biodiversity sensing. • Spectral-biodiversity relationship depends on spectral range and bands. • Red-Edge and NIR bands captured compositional variation in ground cover. • Structural diversity from canopy height models is less effective for plant diversity. • Combining spectral and structural variables boosts biodiversity assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing Applications Society and Environment
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2025.101685
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biodiversity monitoring in urban community gardens using proximal sensing and drone remote sensing

Kang Yu, Yasamin Afrasiabian, Elisa Van Cleemput, Monika Egerer et al.
1 citations
Remote Sensing Applications Society and Environment
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
article

Biodiversity monitoring in urban community gardens using proximal sensing and drone remote sensing

Kang Yu, Yasamin Afrasiabian, Elisa Van Cleemput, Monika Egerer, Felix Contiz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In urban community gardens, artificially managed ground cover types, including vegetative and non-vegetative ground components, are both critical to ecological functioning. Yet, how these non-vegetative components influence spectral diversity in ways that are different from natural systems has not been addressed. This study investigated the potential of combining spectral and structural diversity variables, corresponding to the Spectral Variation and Height Variation Hypotheses, respectively, to monitor plant and ground cover diversity. These variables were derived from in situ hyperspectral measurements, drone-based multispectral imagery, and three-dimensional canopy height models. We examined four biodiversity variables, including plant species richness, total plant abundances, ground cover entropy, and ground cover richness, across five urban community gardens over two years. Spectral diversity was calculated based on the Coefficient of Variation (CV), Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM), and Shannon’s Entropy (Entropy) indices at multiple spectral ranges. Structural diversity variables, including canopy height variation and image texture features. Our results showed that Red-Edge and Near-infrared (NIR) bands effectively captured compositional variation in ground cover, while visible wavelengths better reflected subtle differences in vegetative components. Texture features and height-based structural variables provided valuable insights into canopy complexity, particularly improving predictions of plant abundance and ground cover entropy. Finally, we found that integrating spectral and structural diversity variables further enhanced predictive performance due to considering canopy biochemical and structural differences. This multi-metric approach outperformed single-source analyses, underscoring the value of combining complementary remote sensing data for better interpreting urban garden biodiversity. Our findings highlight the importance of characterizing canopy structural heterogeneity in advancing biodiversity monitoring within these complex urban ecosystems. • Non-vegetative ground cover components influence biodiversity sensing. • Spectral-biodiversity relationship depends on spectral range and bands. • Red-Edge and NIR bands captured compositional variation in ground cover. • Structural diversity from canopy height models is less effective for plant diversity. • Combining spectral and structural variables boosts biodiversity assessment.

Remote Sensing Applications Society and EnvironmentVol. 39
Technical University of Munich (DE), The Hague University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.