Drivers of global glacial erosion rates

Glacial erosion must be quantified to better constrain numerous geomorphic and orogenic processes; however, accurate models of glacial erosion have been limited by sparse data. Here we use machine learning tools to develop equations that integrate glacial erosion and glaciological, topoclimatic and geological variables based on a global-scale synthesis of 181 contemporary glacier-derived erosion rates. The results reveal environment-specific erosion rate equations for surge-type, marine- and land-terminating glacial settings. We demonstrate that glacial velocity is not the most statistically important predictor of glacial erosion in any environment. Instead, an improved prediction of glacial erosion is attained when velocity is considered with additional glaciological, topoclimatic and geological variables, with the most dominant influences exhibited by precipitation, glacial elevation, length, latitude and the underlying geology. Using these equations, we estimate erosion rates for 85% of contemporary glaciers, with 99% eroding between 0.02 and 2.68 mm yr−1. Our results suggest a need to adjust how we predict or hindcast glacial erosion rates and highlight their sensitivity not only to changes in glacial sliding velocity but also to additional glaciological, topoclimatic and geological influences. Considering glaciological, topoclimatic and geological variables in addition to glacial velocity improves the prediction of glacial erosion rates according to a machine learning-based global analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Geoscience
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-025-01747-8
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drivers of global glacial erosion rates

Richard B. Alley, Romain Millan, John Gosse, Antoine Rabatel et al.
3 citations
Nature Geoscience
Cryospheric studies and observations
3.90
article

Drivers of global glacial erosion rates

Richard B. Alley, Romain Millan, John Gosse, Antoine Rabatel, Sophie L. Norris, J. Mouginot, Matthew Bolton, Mathieu Morlighem
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Glacial erosion must be quantified to better constrain numerous geomorphic and orogenic processes; however, accurate models of glacial erosion have been limited by sparse data. Here we use machine learning tools to develop equations that integrate glacial erosion and glaciological, topoclimatic and geological variables based on a global-scale synthesis of 181 contemporary glacier-derived erosion rates. The results reveal environment-specific erosion rate equations for surge-type, marine- and land-terminating glacial settings. We demonstrate that glacial velocity is not the most statistically important predictor of glacial erosion in any environment. Instead, an improved prediction of glacial erosion is attained when velocity is considered with additional glaciological, topoclimatic and geological variables, with the most dominant influences exhibited by precipitation, glacial elevation, length, latitude and the underlying geology. Using these equations, we estimate erosion rates for 85% of contemporary glaciers, with 99% eroding between 0.02 and 2.68 mm yr−1. Our results suggest a need to adjust how we predict or hindcast glacial erosion rates and highlight their sensitivity not only to changes in glacial sliding velocity but also to additional glaciological, topoclimatic and geological influences. Considering glaciological, topoclimatic and geological variables in addition to glacial velocity improves the prediction of glacial erosion rates according to a machine learning-based global analysis.

Nature GeoscienceVol. 18(8)
Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR), Dartmouth College (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Dalhousie University (CA), Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Alberta (CA), University of Victoria (CA), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institut des Géosciences de l'Environnement (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Nuclear Waste Management Organization, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cryospheric studies and observations
3.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.