The Development of a Rapid Review Planning Template for Educational Researchers

Abstract: Research evidence syntheses offer rigorous methodology for integrated overviews of scientific knowledge on specific topics. Yet high-quality meta-analyses and systematic reviews often take years to complete. Rapid reviews are an evidence synthesis, gaining popularity in medical contexts, with adaptable methodology emphasizing stakeholder involvement and time sensitivity. By accelerating some processes, rapid reviews are particularly useful for emerging research topics or technologies, offering stakeholders relevant, up-to-date information. Given these benefits, this method is likely to expand into education. Methodologists recommend adhering to high transparency standards, since evidence on the effects of streamlining processes is still limited; but guidelines are already emerging in the medical context. While some standards may be applicable for educational research, the variability and context sensitivity inherent in education also need consideration. Accordingly, this Research Spotlight presents the development of a rapid review planning template for educational researchers, that emphasizes possibilities for stakeholder involvement and flexibility for transparent methodological processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Psychologie
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000593
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Development of a Rapid Review Planning Template for Educational Researchers

Tina Seidel, Meg Farrell
1 citations
Zeitschrift für Psychologie
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
1.88
article

The Development of a Rapid Review Planning Template for Educational Researchers

Tina Seidel, Meg Farrell
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract: Research evidence syntheses offer rigorous methodology for integrated overviews of scientific knowledge on specific topics. Yet high-quality meta-analyses and systematic reviews often take years to complete. Rapid reviews are an evidence synthesis, gaining popularity in medical contexts, with adaptable methodology emphasizing stakeholder involvement and time sensitivity. By accelerating some processes, rapid reviews are particularly useful for emerging research topics or technologies, offering stakeholders relevant, up-to-date information. Given these benefits, this method is likely to expand into education. Methodologists recommend adhering to high transparency standards, since evidence on the effects of streamlining processes is still limited; but guidelines are already emerging in the medical context. While some standards may be applicable for educational research, the variability and context sensitivity inherent in education also need consideration. Accordingly, this Research Spotlight presents the development of a rapid review planning template for educational researchers, that emphasizes possibilities for stakeholder involvement and flexibility for transparent methodological processes.

Zeitschrift für PsychologieVol. 233(2)
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.