Advancing Transparency and Reproducibility

Abstract: This study addresses the adaptation of research synthesis standards in social, educational, and psychological sciences. It emphasizes the need for comprehensive documentation and adherence to reporting guidelines and FAIR principles to ensure transparency, reproducibility, and data reuse. Existing guidelines, such as PRISMA and FAIR, provide documentation guidance but lack specifics on making methodological data accessible. The study aims to develop a set of criteria to document review processes and data, enhancing reproducibility in psychology and education. Using a sample of 100 systematic reviews within these disciplines, it evaluates the adherence to these criteria. The results reveal the extent of documentation rigor, identify missing elements, and give recommendations for improving research synthesis documentation. The study's findings will contribute to standardizing synthesis documentation and promote transparency and collaboration in the scientific community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Psychologie
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000592
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing Transparency and Reproducibility

Tamara Heck, Tanja Burgard, Nadeshda Jung, Claudiu Petrule
2 citations
Zeitschrift für Psychologie
Research Data Management Practices
6.49
article

Advancing Transparency and Reproducibility

Tamara Heck, Tanja Burgard, Nadeshda Jung, Claudiu Petrule
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract: This study addresses the adaptation of research synthesis standards in social, educational, and psychological sciences. It emphasizes the need for comprehensive documentation and adherence to reporting guidelines and FAIR principles to ensure transparency, reproducibility, and data reuse. Existing guidelines, such as PRISMA and FAIR, provide documentation guidance but lack specifics on making methodological data accessible. The study aims to develop a set of criteria to document review processes and data, enhancing reproducibility in psychology and education. Using a sample of 100 systematic reviews within these disciplines, it evaluates the adherence to these criteria. The results reveal the extent of documentation rigor, identify missing elements, and give recommendations for improving research synthesis documentation. The study's findings will contribute to standardizing synthesis documentation and promote transparency and collaboration in the scientific community.

Zeitschrift für PsychologieVol. 233(2)
Leibniz Institute for Psychology (DE), DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Research Data Management Practices
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.