Comparison of Nurses’ and Families’ beliefs and attitudes regarding visiting policy in selected intensive care units of Ghana

The intensive care unit (ICU) is a challenging environment for patients, families, and healthcare professionals. Nurses often seek a calm and controlled work setting, while families prioritize proximity to their loved ones due to an increased feeling of anxiety. Existing literature suggests that liberalized visiting hours may offer benefits, such as reducing patient anxiety and improving communication between patients and families. However, there are also conflicting viewpoints on this matter. This study aims to compare the beliefs and attitudes of nurses and families regarding ICU visiting policies in selected hospitals in Ghana. A comparative descriptive cross-sectional quantitative design was employed for this study. Participants were recruited from four public hospitals in Ghana, using consensus sampling for nurses and convenient sampling for family members. A self-administered questionnaire, the Beliefs and Attitudes Towards Visiting in ICU Questionnaire (BAVIQ) , was utilized as the primary data collection tool. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 16. The study found a significant difference in the beliefs of nurses and families, but no significant difference in their attitudes towards ICU visitation. An independent t -test revealed that nurses favoured a restricted visiting policy, whereas families preferred an open visiting policy, although their attitudes remained somewhat skeptical. Nurses preferred that only three or fewer persons visit a patient in 24 h. Family members preferred 3–4 visitors within 24 h, with one visitor allowed at a time. A significant relationship was identified between nurses’ beliefs, attitudes, and demographic variables, except for age. Family members supported visitation but expressed concerns that unrestricted visiting could disrupt patient rest, cause psychological stress, and infringe on privacy. They favoured a slightly restrictive visiting policy, allowing 3–4 visitors within 24 h, with one visitor allowed at a time. To enhance patient-centered care, a balanced approach that considers the needs of patients, families, and healthcare professionals should be adopted when developing ICU visitation policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2025.100879
Primary Topic
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Nurses’ and Families’ beliefs and attitudes regarding visiting policy in selected intensive care units of Ghana

Yakubu H. Yakubu, Navab Elham, Maryam Esmaeilie
International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
article

Comparison of Nurses’ and Families’ beliefs and attitudes regarding visiting policy in selected intensive care units of Ghana

Yakubu H. Yakubu, Navab Elham, Maryam Esmaeilie
article en

Abstract

The intensive care unit (ICU) is a challenging environment for patients, families, and healthcare professionals. Nurses often seek a calm and controlled work setting, while families prioritize proximity to their loved ones due to an increased feeling of anxiety. Existing literature suggests that liberalized visiting hours may offer benefits, such as reducing patient anxiety and improving communication between patients and families. However, there are also conflicting viewpoints on this matter. This study aims to compare the beliefs and attitudes of nurses and families regarding ICU visiting policies in selected hospitals in Ghana. A comparative descriptive cross-sectional quantitative design was employed for this study. Participants were recruited from four public hospitals in Ghana, using consensus sampling for nurses and convenient sampling for family members. A self-administered questionnaire, the Beliefs and Attitudes Towards Visiting in ICU Questionnaire (BAVIQ) , was utilized as the primary data collection tool. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 16. The study found a significant difference in the beliefs of nurses and families, but no significant difference in their attitudes towards ICU visitation. An independent t -test revealed that nurses favoured a restricted visiting policy, whereas families preferred an open visiting policy, although their attitudes remained somewhat skeptical. Nurses preferred that only three or fewer persons visit a patient in 24 h. Family members preferred 3–4 visitors within 24 h, with one visitor allowed at a time. A significant relationship was identified between nurses’ beliefs, attitudes, and demographic variables, except for age. Family members supported visitation but expressed concerns that unrestricted visiting could disrupt patient rest, cause psychological stress, and infringe on privacy. They favoured a slightly restrictive visiting policy, allowing 3–4 visitors within 24 h, with one visitor allowed at a time. To enhance patient-centered care, a balanced approach that considers the needs of patients, families, and healthcare professionals should be adopted when developing ICU visitation policies.

International Journal of Africa Nursing SciencesVol. 23
Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tamale Teaching Hospital (GH), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.