A Unified Framework for Modeling Feedback and Endogeneity in Longitudinal Binary Outcomes Using Bayesian Methods

Longitudinal studies with binary outcomes often involve time-dependent covariates that evolve alongside outcomes, introducing feedback effects and endogeneity. Standard approaches, such as Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) and Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM), typically assume covariate exogeneity, leading to biased and inconsistent estimates when feedback is present. We propose a unified three-step hierarchical Bayesian framework to address these challenges. First, the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) identifies valid instruments to correct for endogeneity. Second, a Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression model estimates outcome probabilities while accounting for within-subject correlation. Third, a reversal model explicitly captures feedback by modeling time-dependent covariates as outcomes influenced by prior responses. Through simulations, we demonstrate that the proposed framework substantially reduces bias, lowers root mean squared error (RMSE), and improves uncertainty quantification compared to traditional methods, especially under moderate to strong feedback. We illustrate the practical utility of the approach using a synthetic longitudinal diabetes dataset, where feedback between prior glucose levels and self-monitoring behavior meaningfully alters inference. This integrated framework provides a flexible and interpretable solution for longitudinal binary data analysis, particularly in clinical, behavioral, and public health research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70221
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Unified Framework for Modeling Feedback and Endogeneity in Longitudinal Binary Outcomes Using Bayesian Methods

Ruoqian Liu, Jeffrey R. Wilson, Lori P. Selby
Statistics in Medicine
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

A Unified Framework for Modeling Feedback and Endogeneity in Longitudinal Binary Outcomes Using Bayesian Methods

Ruoqian Liu, Jeffrey R. Wilson, Lori P. Selby
article en

Abstract

Longitudinal studies with binary outcomes often involve time-dependent covariates that evolve alongside outcomes, introducing feedback effects and endogeneity. Standard approaches, such as Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) and Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM), typically assume covariate exogeneity, leading to biased and inconsistent estimates when feedback is present. We propose a unified three-step hierarchical Bayesian framework to address these challenges. First, the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) identifies valid instruments to correct for endogeneity. Second, a Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression model estimates outcome probabilities while accounting for within-subject correlation. Third, a reversal model explicitly captures feedback by modeling time-dependent covariates as outcomes influenced by prior responses. Through simulations, we demonstrate that the proposed framework substantially reduces bias, lowers root mean squared error (RMSE), and improves uncertainty quantification compared to traditional methods, especially under moderate to strong feedback. We illustrate the practical utility of the approach using a synthetic longitudinal diabetes dataset, where feedback between prior glucose levels and self-monitoring behavior meaningfully alters inference. This integrated framework provides a flexible and interpretable solution for longitudinal binary data analysis, particularly in clinical, behavioral, and public health research.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 44(18-19)
Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.