Combining Missing Data Imputation and Internal Validation in Clinical Risk Prediction Models

Methods to handle missing data have been extensively explored in the context of estimation and descriptive studies, with multiple imputation being the most widely used method in clinical research. However, in the context of clinical risk prediction models, where the goal is often to achieve high prediction accuracy and to make predictions for future patients, there are different considerations regarding the handling of missing covariate data. As a result, deterministic imputation is better suited to the setting of clinical risk prediction models, since the outcome is not included in the imputation model and the imputation method can be easily applied to future patients. In this paper, we provide a tutorial demonstrating how to conduct bootstrapping followed by deterministic imputation of missing covariate data to construct and internally validate the performance of a clinical risk prediction model in the presence of missing data. Simulation study results are provided to help guide when imputation may be appropriate in real-world applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70203
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining Missing Data Imputation and Internal Validation in Clinical Risk Prediction Models

Jinhua Mi, Emily Craig Zabor, Sujata Patil, Rahul D. Tendulkar et al.
Statistics in Medicine
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

Combining Missing Data Imputation and Internal Validation in Clinical Risk Prediction Models

Jinhua Mi, Emily Craig Zabor, Sujata Patil, Rahul D. Tendulkar, Sarah M. C. Sittenfeld
article en

Abstract

Methods to handle missing data have been extensively explored in the context of estimation and descriptive studies, with multiple imputation being the most widely used method in clinical research. However, in the context of clinical risk prediction models, where the goal is often to achieve high prediction accuracy and to make predictions for future patients, there are different considerations regarding the handling of missing covariate data. As a result, deterministic imputation is better suited to the setting of clinical risk prediction models, since the outcome is not included in the imputation model and the imputation method can be easily applied to future patients. In this paper, we provide a tutorial demonstrating how to conduct bootstrapping followed by deterministic imputation of missing covariate data to construct and internally validate the performance of a clinical risk prediction model in the presence of missing data. Simulation study results are provided to help guide when imputation may be appropriate in real-world applications.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 44(18-19)
Cleveland Clinic (US), University of Cincinnati (US)
Cleveland Clinic
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Combining Missing Data Imputation and Internal Validation in Clinical Risk Prediction Models — Jinhua Mi, Emily Craig Zabor, et al. · Statistics in Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS