Constructing a <i>T</i> ‐Test for Value Function Comparison of Individualized Treatment Regimes in the Presence of Multiple Imputation for Missing Data

Optimal individualized treatment decision-making has improved health outcomes in recent years. The value function is commonly used to evaluate the goodness of an individualized treatment decision rule. Despite recent advances, comparing value functions between different treatment decision rules or constructing confidence intervals around value functions remains difficult. We propose a t-test based method applied to a test set that generates valid p-values to compare value functions between a given pair of treatment decision rules when some of the data are missing. We demonstrate the ease in use of this method and evaluate its performance via simulation studies and apply it to the China Health and Nutrition Survey data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70210
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructing a T ‐Test for Value Function Comparison of Individualized Treatment Regimes in the Presence of Multiple Imputation for Missing Data

Penny Gordon‐Larsen, Katie A. Meyer, Shufa Du, Michael R. Kosorok et al.
Statistics in Medicine
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

Constructing a T ‐Test for Value Function Comparison of Individualized Treatment Regimes in the Presence of Multiple Imputation for Missing Data

Penny Gordon‐Larsen, Katie A. Meyer, Shufa Du, Michael R. Kosorok, Annie Green Howard, Bing Zhang, Minxin Lu, Hsiao‐Chuan Tien, Huijun Wang
article en

Abstract

Optimal individualized treatment decision-making has improved health outcomes in recent years. The value function is commonly used to evaluate the goodness of an individualized treatment decision rule. Despite recent advances, comparing value functions between different treatment decision rules or constructing confidence intervals around value functions remains difficult. We propose a t-test based method applied to a test set that generates valid p-values to compare value functions between a given pair of treatment decision rules when some of the data are missing. We demonstrate the ease in use of this method and evaluate its performance via simulation studies and apply it to the China Health and Nutrition Survey data.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 44(18-19)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Constructing a <i>T</i> ‐Test for Value Function Comparison of Individualized Treatment Regimes in the Presence of Multiple Imputation for Missing Data — Penny Gordon‐Larsen, Katie A. Meyer, et al. · Statistics in Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS