Locusts in Cuneiform Script: On the Interpretation of the Combination BURU<sub>5</sub><sup>v</sup>.mušen in the Fragment Sm.2073 of an ‘Assyrian Dream-Book’

In the fragment Sm.2073 of an “Assyrian Dream-Book”, a certain animal is mentioned as an ingredient in a list of various soups, written in cuneiform with the combination BURU5v.mušen, using the graphic variant BURU5v (ḪU.ERIM) instead of BURU5 (NAM.ERIM) and the determinative of a bird or flying creature .mušen. Three interpretations of this Sumerogram are possible: Akk. iṣṣūru “(small) bird”, erbu “locust”, or āribu “crow, raven”. The analysis of the contexts in which this combination was used in cuneiform texts of the 1st millennium B.C. shows that the use of one or another graphic variant of the sign or the presence of a determinative does not speak in favor of any of the variants. In this connection, the interpretation of BURU5v.mušen as Akk. erbu “locust” seems to be the most acceptable, since this animal, unlike āribu, is widely attested as a foodstuff, while iṣṣūru in similar contexts is written with another Sumerogram.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Письменные памятники Востока
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55512/wmo635715
Primary Topic
Ancient Near East History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Locusts in Cuneiform Script: On the Interpretation of the Combination BURU5v.mušen in the Fragment Sm.2073 of an ‘Assyrian Dream-Book’

Matvei D. Lopatin
1 links
Письменные памятники Востока
Ancient Near East History
article

Locusts in Cuneiform Script: On the Interpretation of the Combination BURU5v.mušen in the Fragment Sm.2073 of an ‘Assyrian Dream-Book’

Matvei D. Lopatin
article en

Abstract

In the fragment Sm.2073 of an “Assyrian Dream-Book”, a certain animal is mentioned as an ingredient in a list of various soups, written in cuneiform with the combination BURU5v.mušen, using the graphic variant BURU5v (ḪU.ERIM) instead of BURU5 (NAM.ERIM) and the determinative of a bird or flying creature .mušen. Three interpretations of this Sumerogram are possible: Akk. iṣṣūru “(small) bird”, erbu “locust”, or āribu “crow, raven”. The analysis of the contexts in which this combination was used in cuneiform texts of the 1st millennium B.C. shows that the use of one or another graphic variant of the sign or the presence of a determinative does not speak in favor of any of the variants. In this connection, the interpretation of BURU5v.mušen as Akk. erbu “locust” seems to be the most acceptable, since this animal, unlike āribu, is widely attested as a foodstuff, while iṣṣūru in similar contexts is written with another Sumerogram.

Письменные памятники ВостокаVol. 21(4)
St Petersburg University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Ancient Near East History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Locusts in Cuneiform Script: On the Interpretation of the Combination BURU<sub>5</sub><sup>v</sup>.mušen in the Fragment Sm.2073 of an ‘Assyrian Dream-Book’ — Matvei D. Lopatin · Письменные памятники Востока (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS