DETABOOING AS A TOOL FOR MANIPULATING PUBLIC OPINION IN THE ENGLISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE

The article considers examples of linguistic detabooing used in modern Englishlanguage mass media for the purpose of manipulating public opinion. It reveals the concept of tabooing, which is reflected in the modern mass media and is used when press conferences, talk shows or interviews touch upon topics that are traditionally taboo in public life – death, interpersonal relationships, illnesses, mental and physical disabilities, violation of rights, violence, war, criticism of traditions and foundations of other countries and nationalities, etc. The article is focused on linguistic means of detabooing – dysphemisms and means of verbalizing the concept FRIEND-AND-FOE. According to the analysis of the language material, the opposition “friend-and-foe” is characterized by the use of detabooing in relation to “foes”, and tabooing – in relation to “friends”. Bad actions of “others” are named directly and expressively, often with the help of dysphemisms, while similar actions of “ours” are covered in neutral expressions using euphemisms. The main goal of detabooing is to break taboos and overcome any prohibitions. The reasons for turning to detabooing are analyzed, including discrediting the opponent, unwillingness to soften the unpleasant realities of life, aggressive behavior, the desire to get closer to the audience, etc.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Literary Theory Linguistics Cultural Studies Series
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2025-3-84-90
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DETABOOING AS A TOOL FOR MANIPULATING PUBLIC OPINION IN THE ENGLISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE

Ekaterina Yu. Dubovitskaya
RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Literary Theory Linguistics Cultural Studies Series
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

DETABOOING AS A TOOL FOR MANIPULATING PUBLIC OPINION IN THE ENGLISH POLITICAL DISCOURSE

Ekaterina Yu. Dubovitskaya
article en

Abstract

The article considers examples of linguistic detabooing used in modern Englishlanguage mass media for the purpose of manipulating public opinion. It reveals the concept of tabooing, which is reflected in the modern mass media and is used when press conferences, talk shows or interviews touch upon topics that are traditionally taboo in public life – death, interpersonal relationships, illnesses, mental and physical disabilities, violation of rights, violence, war, criticism of traditions and foundations of other countries and nationalities, etc. The article is focused on linguistic means of detabooing – dysphemisms and means of verbalizing the concept FRIEND-AND-FOE. According to the analysis of the language material, the opposition “friend-and-foe” is characterized by the use of detabooing in relation to “foes”, and tabooing – in relation to “friends”. Bad actions of “others” are named directly and expressively, often with the help of dysphemisms, while similar actions of “ours” are covered in neutral expressions using euphemisms. The main goal of detabooing is to break taboos and overcome any prohibitions. The reasons for turning to detabooing are analyzed, including discrediting the opponent, unwillingness to soften the unpleasant realities of life, aggressive behavior, the desire to get closer to the audience, etc.

RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Literary Theory Linguistics Cultural Studies Series(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.